Impact of digital competencies and assistive technologies on learning outcomes for students with learning disabilities in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Background Assistive technology (AT) offers a vital role in providing a learning environment for disabled students. This paper investigates the role of AT and digital skills in enhancing learning outcomes for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) students having Learning Disabilities (LD). Objectives This review aims to explore the extent of technological applications to support students face LD. This review identifies the core skills that require further enrichment and the technological tools used for skill development, the impact of technological tools on the performance of students with LD, and investigate a variety of research on technological amelioration to assist KSA students with LD. The study also covers various research domains where further exploration is vital. Methods The review encompasses a detailed investigation of 35 research articles in the specific range of 2014–2025. In the study, 24 papers (69%) were targeted at primary and middle schools. The remaining 11 (31%) studies involved other participants such as University or special education. The review process encompasses 09 databases and follows a systematic and widely recognized approach of PRISMA 20 guidelines. Results The review revealed that past studies focused on multiple baseline designs focusing primarily on elementary school students and a few other educational settings such as special education and university. The review also highlights key skills where research elevation is of utmost value, and fruitful outcomes can be attained by applying technological tools to support these skills. Further, the review outcome demonstrates that technological tool applications have a positive impact on students’ performance. Conclusion The review unveiled that Dyslexia disability is the most common in students with LD, constituting 12 papers (34%), followed by Dyscalculia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The review outcome recommends various elucidations, including expanding teacher training programs, addressing infrastructural gaps, and conducting more localized studies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1640556
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Technology Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of digital competencies and assistive technologies on learning outcomes for students with learning disabilities in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Dalia A. Bedewy, Mohamed S. Hamid, Saud Al-Shammari, Eid Abo Hamza et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Education and Technology Integration
8.93
article

Impact of digital competencies and assistive technologies on learning outcomes for students with learning disabilities in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Dalia A. Bedewy, Mohamed S. Hamid, Saud Al-Shammari, Eid Abo Hamza, Salaheldin Farah Attallah Bakhiet, Nagwa Ibrahim A. Mohamed, Fatma Mohamed Elkhier Elsiddig
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Assistive technology (AT) offers a vital role in providing a learning environment for disabled students. This paper investigates the role of AT and digital skills in enhancing learning outcomes for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) students having Learning Disabilities (LD). Objectives This review aims to explore the extent of technological applications to support students face LD. This review identifies the core skills that require further enrichment and the technological tools used for skill development, the impact of technological tools on the performance of students with LD, and investigate a variety of research on technological amelioration to assist KSA students with LD. The study also covers various research domains where further exploration is vital. Methods The review encompasses a detailed investigation of 35 research articles in the specific range of 2014–2025. In the study, 24 papers (69%) were targeted at primary and middle schools. The remaining 11 (31%) studies involved other participants such as University or special education. The review process encompasses 09 databases and follows a systematic and widely recognized approach of PRISMA 20 guidelines. Results The review revealed that past studies focused on multiple baseline designs focusing primarily on elementary school students and a few other educational settings such as special education and university. The review also highlights key skills where research elevation is of utmost value, and fruitful outcomes can be attained by applying technological tools to support these skills. Further, the review outcome demonstrates that technological tool applications have a positive impact on students’ performance. Conclusion The review unveiled that Dyslexia disability is the most common in students with LD, constituting 12 papers (34%), followed by Dyscalculia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The review outcome recommends various elucidations, including expanding teacher training programs, addressing infrastructural gaps, and conducting more localized studies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Ain Shams University (EG), Ajman University (AE), Tanta University (EG), University of Sharjah (AE), University of Ha'il (SA), Arabian Gulf University (BH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Education and Technology Integration
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.