A regional physical–biogeochemical ocean model for marine resource applications in the Northeast Pacific (MOM6-COBALT-NEP10k v1.0)

Abstract. Regional ocean models enable the generation of computationally affordable and regionally tailored ensembles of near-term forecasts and long-term projections of sufficient resolution to serve marine resource management. Climate change, however, has created marine resource challenges, such as shifting stock distributions, that cut across domestic and international management boundaries and have pushed regional modeling efforts toward “coastwide” approaches. Here, we present and evaluate a multidecadal hindcast with a Northeast Pacific regional implementation of the Modular Ocean Model, version 6, with sea ice and biogeochemistry that extends from the Chukchi Sea to the Baja California Peninsula at 10 km horizontal resolution (MOM6-COBALT-NEP10k, or NEP10k). This domain includes an Arctic-adjacent system with a broad, shallow shelf seasonally covered by sea ice (the eastern Bering Sea), a sub-Arctic system with upwelling in the Alaska Gyre and predominant downwelling winds and large freshwater forcing along the coast (the Gulf of Alaska), and a temperate, eastern boundary upwelling ecosystem (the California Current Ecosystem). The coastwide model was able to recreate seasonal and cross-ecosystem contrasts in numerous ecosystem-critical properties including temperature, salinity, inorganic nutrients, oxygen, carbonate saturation states, and chlorophyll. Spatial consistency between modeled quantities and observations generally extended to plankton ecosystems, though small to moderate biases were also apparent. Fidelity with observed zooplankton biomass, for example, was limited to first-order seasonal and cross-system contrasts. Temporally, simulated monthly surface and bottom temperature anomalies in coastal regions (<500 m deep) closely matched estimates from data-assimilative ocean reanalyses. Performance, however, was reduced in some nearshore regions coarsely resolved by the model's 10 km resolution grid and for point measurements. The time series of satellite-based chlorophyll anomaly estimates proved more difficult to match than temperature. System-specific ecosystem indicators were also assessed. In the eastern Bering Sea, NEP10k robustly matched observed variations, including recent large declines, in the area of the summer bottom water “cold pool” (<2 °C), which exerts a profound influence on eastern Bering Sea fisheries. In the Gulf of Alaska, the simulation captured patterns of sea surface height variability and variations in thermal, oxygen, and acidification risk associated with local modes of interannual to decadal climate variability. In the California Current Ecosystem, the simulation robustly captured variations in upwelling indices and coastal water masses, though discrepancies in the latter were evident in the Southern California Bight. Enhanced model resolution may reduce such discrepancies, but any benefits must be carefully weighed against computational costs given the intended use of this system for ensemble predictions and projections. Meanwhile, the demonstrated NEP10k skill level herein, particularly in recreating cross-ecosystem contrasts and the time variation of ecosystem indicators over multiple decades, suggests considerable immediate utility for coastwide retrospective and predictive applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5245-2025
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A regional physical–biogeochemical ocean model for marine resource applications in the Northeast Pacific (MOM6-COBALT-NEP10k v1.0)

Robert Hallberg, Alistair Adcroft, Elizabeth J. Drenkard, Michael G. Jacox et al.
3 citations
Geoscientific model development
Marine and coastal ecosystems
5.38
article

A regional physical–biogeochemical ocean model for marine resource applications in the Northeast Pacific (MOM6-COBALT-NEP10k v1.0)

Robert Hallberg, Alistair Adcroft, Elizabeth J. Drenkard, Michael G. Jacox, Katherine Hedstrom, Albert J. Hermann, Kelly Kearney, Enrique Curchitser, Darren Pilcher, Claudine Hauri, Andrew C. Ross, Rémi Pagès, Niki Zadeh, Mercedes Pozo Buil, Wei Cheng, Charles A. A Stock, Raphaël Dussin, Theresa J. Morrison, Vivek Seelanki, Yi‐Cheng Teng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Regional ocean models enable the generation of computationally affordable and regionally tailored ensembles of near-term forecasts and long-term projections of sufficient resolution to serve marine resource management. Climate change, however, has created marine resource challenges, such as shifting stock distributions, that cut across domestic and international management boundaries and have pushed regional modeling efforts toward “coastwide” approaches. Here, we present and evaluate a multidecadal hindcast with a Northeast Pacific regional implementation of the Modular Ocean Model, version 6, with sea ice and biogeochemistry that extends from the Chukchi Sea to the Baja California Peninsula at 10 km horizontal resolution (MOM6-COBALT-NEP10k, or NEP10k). This domain includes an Arctic-adjacent system with a broad, shallow shelf seasonally covered by sea ice (the eastern Bering Sea), a sub-Arctic system with upwelling in the Alaska Gyre and predominant downwelling winds and large freshwater forcing along the coast (the Gulf of Alaska), and a temperate, eastern boundary upwelling ecosystem (the California Current Ecosystem). The coastwide model was able to recreate seasonal and cross-ecosystem contrasts in numerous ecosystem-critical properties including temperature, salinity, inorganic nutrients, oxygen, carbonate saturation states, and chlorophyll. Spatial consistency between modeled quantities and observations generally extended to plankton ecosystems, though small to moderate biases were also apparent. Fidelity with observed zooplankton biomass, for example, was limited to first-order seasonal and cross-system contrasts. Temporally, simulated monthly surface and bottom temperature anomalies in coastal regions (<500 m deep) closely matched estimates from data-assimilative ocean reanalyses. Performance, however, was reduced in some nearshore regions coarsely resolved by the model's 10 km resolution grid and for point measurements. The time series of satellite-based chlorophyll anomaly estimates proved more difficult to match than temperature. System-specific ecosystem indicators were also assessed. In the eastern Bering Sea, NEP10k robustly matched observed variations, including recent large declines, in the area of the summer bottom water “cold pool” (<2 °C), which exerts a profound influence on eastern Bering Sea fisheries. In the Gulf of Alaska, the simulation captured patterns of sea surface height variability and variations in thermal, oxygen, and acidification risk associated with local modes of interannual to decadal climate variability. In the California Current Ecosystem, the simulation robustly captured variations in upwelling indices and coastal water masses, though discrepancies in the latter were evident in the Southern California Bight. Enhanced model resolution may reduce such discrepancies, but any benefits must be carefully weighed against computational costs given the intended use of this system for ensemble predictions and projections. Meanwhile, the demonstrated NEP10k skill level herein, particularly in recreating cross-ecosystem contrasts and the time variation of ecosystem indicators over multiple decades, suggests considerable immediate utility for coastwide retrospective and predictive applications.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(16)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center (US), Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, North Pacific Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
5.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.