Critical education, generative artificial intelligence and the tyranny of freedom: a critique of modern ‘technocracy’

This paper provides a critical analysis of Gen-AI technologies, questioning their role as the liberators of learning. Much has already been written about Gen-AI, but little has been said regarding its purported temporal efficiency as a tool of intellectual freedom. This paper casts doubt on the value of this efficiency, delivering a critique of Gen-AI technological freedom as a dubious virtue at best, a form of freedom that offers little to the development of critical learning and reasoning capacities. This critique is grounded in a Freirean approach to critical education, one that understands the concept of learner freedom or learner autonomy as a socially constructed and collective endeavour. The paper outlines this position by discussing key elements of Freire’s thinking, including notions of problematisation, critical dialogue and acts of knowing. It concludes by suggesting potential alternatives to what Freire called the ‘tyranny of freedom’ in the application of educational technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology Pedagogy and Education
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2025.2547728
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical education, generative artificial intelligence and the tyranny of freedom: a critique of modern ‘technocracy’

Mark Murphy, Cristina Costa
5 citations
Technology Pedagogy and Education
Digital Education and Society
16.23
article

Critical education, generative artificial intelligence and the tyranny of freedom: a critique of modern ‘technocracy’

Mark Murphy, Cristina Costa
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of Gen-AI technologies, questioning their role as the liberators of learning. Much has already been written about Gen-AI, but little has been said regarding its purported temporal efficiency as a tool of intellectual freedom. This paper casts doubt on the value of this efficiency, delivering a critique of Gen-AI technological freedom as a dubious virtue at best, a form of freedom that offers little to the development of critical learning and reasoning capacities. This critique is grounded in a Freirean approach to critical education, one that understands the concept of learner freedom or learner autonomy as a socially constructed and collective endeavour. The paper outlines this position by discussing key elements of Freire’s thinking, including notions of problematisation, critical dialogue and acts of knowing. It concludes by suggesting potential alternatives to what Freire called the ‘tyranny of freedom’ in the application of educational technologies.

Technology Pedagogy and Education
Durham University (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Education and Society
16.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.