Everything in Its Own Time: Planning Horizons Vary Across Financial Domains

ABSTRACT Financial planning horizons reflect the time periods people use for their financial decisions. They are measured to understand and inform financial decisions and to predict financial outcomes like using a financial advisor, having a retirement account, or having lower inflation expectations. Financial surveys typically ask participants to report one planning horizon for “saving and spending,” seemingly assuming that people use one planning horizon for saving and for spending and that this one planning horizon also applies to other financial domains such as investing and retirement finances. The underlying reasoning may be that money is fungible, with one extra dollar of spending removing one dollar from the money available for saving, investing, or retirement finances. Here, we report on three US‐wide studies in which people indicated using different planning horizons across financial domains, which were differentially associated with financial outcomes. Median planning horizons were significantly shorter for saving and spending than for retirement finances (Study 1); for spending than for saving (Study 2); and, in order, for spending, saving, investing, and retirement finances (Study 3). Short‐term (vs. long‐term) planning horizons were often more valid predictors of financial outcomes (Studies 1–3), suggesting that short‐term planning horizons may take precedence in financial decisions. A combination of short‐term and long‐term planning horizons may even have independent associations with financial outcomes (Study 3). We conclude that planning horizon questions should ask about specific financial domains and that multiple planning horizons may be relevant to specific financial outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everything in Its Own Time: Planning Horizons Vary Across Financial Domains

Wilbert van der Klaauw, Alycia Chin, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, David Zimmerman
1 citations
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Housing Market and Economics
3.13
article

Everything in Its Own Time: Planning Horizons Vary Across Financial Domains

Wilbert van der Klaauw, Alycia Chin, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, David Zimmerman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Financial planning horizons reflect the time periods people use for their financial decisions. They are measured to understand and inform financial decisions and to predict financial outcomes like using a financial advisor, having a retirement account, or having lower inflation expectations. Financial surveys typically ask participants to report one planning horizon for “saving and spending,” seemingly assuming that people use one planning horizon for saving and for spending and that this one planning horizon also applies to other financial domains such as investing and retirement finances. The underlying reasoning may be that money is fungible, with one extra dollar of spending removing one dollar from the money available for saving, investing, or retirement finances. Here, we report on three US‐wide studies in which people indicated using different planning horizons across financial domains, which were differentially associated with financial outcomes. Median planning horizons were significantly shorter for saving and spending than for retirement finances (Study 1); for spending than for saving (Study 2); and, in order, for spending, saving, investing, and retirement finances (Study 3). Short‐term (vs. long‐term) planning horizons were often more valid predictors of financial outcomes (Studies 1–3), suggesting that short‐term planning horizons may take precedence in financial decisions. A combination of short‐term and long‐term planning horizons may even have independent associations with financial outcomes (Study 3). We conclude that planning horizon questions should ask about specific financial domains and that multiple planning horizons may be relevant to specific financial outcomes.

Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingVol. 38(4)
University of Southern California (US), United States Securities and Exchange Commission (US), Federal Reserve Bank of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Housing Market and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.