Evaluating the implementation of a patient engagement mHealth application in clinical infection prevention

App users perceived the Participatient app as acceptable, which fulfills a precondition for implementation. The implementation strategy evaluated in the present study was designed to fulfill all the conditions considered crucial for implementation. Nevertheless, the level of adoption remained low, and HCPs still imputed their failure to promote the use of the app to insufficiencies in training and communication and to a misfit between the app and their existing workflow. These findings underscore the need to verify whether there may be additional, less evident barriers to the adoption of mHealth tools that support PE in general, and more specifically, to the adoption of Participatient to engage patients in preventing CAUTIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10211
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the implementation of a patient engagement mHealth application in clinical infection prevention

Niels Henrik Chavannes, Rosalie van der Vaart, Robbert G. Bentvelsen, Karin Ellen Veldkamp
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Evaluating the implementation of a patient engagement mHealth application in clinical infection prevention

Niels Henrik Chavannes, Rosalie van der Vaart, Robbert G. Bentvelsen, Karin Ellen Veldkamp
article en

Abstract

App users perceived the Participatient app as acceptable, which fulfills a precondition for implementation. The implementation strategy evaluated in the present study was designed to fulfill all the conditions considered crucial for implementation. Nevertheless, the level of adoption remained low, and HCPs still imputed their failure to promote the use of the app to insufficiencies in training and communication and to a misfit between the app and their existing workflow. These findings underscore the need to verify whether there may be additional, less evident barriers to the adoption of mHealth tools that support PE in general, and more specifically, to the adoption of Participatient to engage patients in preventing CAUTIs.

Infection Control and Hospital EpidemiologyVol. 46(10)
Leiden University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL), The Hague University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, Universiteit Leiden, ZonMw, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the implementation of a patient engagement mHealth application in clinical infection prevention — Niels Henrik Chavannes, Rosalie van der Vaart, et al. · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS