A systematic review of effort discounting research in humans: Current knowledge, recommendations, and future directions

Abstract Effort is a ubiquitous feature in the decision-making literature. Increasing numbers of studies examine the effect of effort requirements on behavior using a discounting framework, assessing the process by which the subjective value of an outcome decreases as the effort required to obtain it increases. Therefore, a review of methodological approaches, findings, and issues is timely. Accordingly, in this systematic review, we identified research studies examining effort discounting to explore how choice architecture factors used in delay discounting and other experimental manipulations affected effort discounting, and the mathematical descriptors used to summarize the relationship between subjective value and effort requirements. Our analysis suggests an area ripe for future research and identifies important knowledge gaps. These gaps are attributable to the use of divergent definitions of effort, as well as highly heterogeneous methodologies, which limit our ability to generate strong conclusions about the intersection between effort and delay discounting processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Judgment and Decision Making
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2025.10009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of effort discounting research in humans: Current knowledge, recommendations, and future directions

Gisel G. Escobar, Suzanne H. Mitchell
1 citations
Judgment and Decision Making
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.27
article

A systematic review of effort discounting research in humans: Current knowledge, recommendations, and future directions

Gisel G. Escobar, Suzanne H. Mitchell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Effort is a ubiquitous feature in the decision-making literature. Increasing numbers of studies examine the effect of effort requirements on behavior using a discounting framework, assessing the process by which the subjective value of an outcome decreases as the effort required to obtain it increases. Therefore, a review of methodological approaches, findings, and issues is timely. Accordingly, in this systematic review, we identified research studies examining effort discounting to explore how choice architecture factors used in delay discounting and other experimental manipulations affected effort discounting, and the mathematical descriptors used to summarize the relationship between subjective value and effort requirements. Our analysis suggests an area ripe for future research and identifies important knowledge gaps. These gaps are attributable to the use of divergent definitions of effort, as well as highly heterogeneous methodologies, which limit our ability to generate strong conclusions about the intersection between effort and delay discounting processes.

Judgment and Decision MakingVol. 20
Oregon Health & Science University (US), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A systematic review of effort discounting research in humans: Current knowledge, recommendations, and future directions — Gisel G. Escobar, Suzanne H. Mitchell · Judgment and Decision Making (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS