Running Fast, Just to Stay in the Same Place? Social Movements, Political Parties, and the Politics of the Portuguese Informal Caregiver Statute (2015–2019)

This article examines the political dynamics behind Portugal’s 2019 Informal Caregiver Statute (ICS), focusing on how social movements influenced the policy process through political mediation. The statute was prompted by caregiver mobilisation and advanced in parliament by partisan allies, despite initial government resistance. The movement’s influence relied on a favourable political opportunity structure, supportive media and public opinion, and the strategic securing of political allies. However, parties integrated the movement’s demands with their own, often conflicting, agendas. In the end, key demands, such as caregiver allowances, pension credits for care work, and expanded public services, were only partially fulfilled. The ICS represents a broad yet limited compromise that reinforces the family’s role as the main care provider. This shift from ‘familism by default’ to ‘supported familism’ may ultimately hinder a transition to ‘optional familism’, which would frame care as a choice and necessitate a significant expansion of formal public services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Society
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746425100882
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Running Fast, Just to Stay in the Same Place? Social Movements, Political Parties, and the Politics of the Portuguese Informal Caregiver Statute (2015–2019)

Fátima Suleman, Rui Branco, Eugénio Oliveira
Social Policy and Society
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Running Fast, Just to Stay in the Same Place? Social Movements, Political Parties, and the Politics of the Portuguese Informal Caregiver Statute (2015–2019)

Fátima Suleman, Rui Branco, Eugénio Oliveira
article en

Abstract

This article examines the political dynamics behind Portugal’s 2019 Informal Caregiver Statute (ICS), focusing on how social movements influenced the policy process through political mediation. The statute was prompted by caregiver mobilisation and advanced in parliament by partisan allies, despite initial government resistance. The movement’s influence relied on a favourable political opportunity structure, supportive media and public opinion, and the strategic securing of political allies. However, parties integrated the movement’s demands with their own, often conflicting, agendas. In the end, key demands, such as caregiver allowances, pension credits for care work, and expanded public services, were only partially fulfilled. The ICS represents a broad yet limited compromise that reinforces the family’s role as the main care provider. This shift from ‘familism by default’ to ‘supported familism’ may ultimately hinder a transition to ‘optional familism’, which would frame care as a choice and necessitate a significant expansion of formal public services.

Social Policy and Society
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.