An assessment on power balance between Kim Jong Un and Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition in early Kim Jong Un period(2011-2016) : Focusing on changes in the composition of WPK 6th Politburo

This study argues, based on data on changes in the composition of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea, that the relationship between the inexperienced young leader Kim Jong Un and the senior elites of Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition was not adversarial. Contrary to common assumptions, the number of purges within the early Politburo under Kim Jong Un was relatively limited. Those who were purged tended to be either marginal figures within Kim Jong Il’s coalition or newly recruited members incorporated after 2009. The majority of replaced Politburo members were retired due to their advanced age, a practice applied even to key supporters of KJU. Key elite figures, including party secretaries who had formed the core of Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition, largely remained in place. While Kim Jong Un clearly asserted his leadership through the functional reorganization of the Politburo, consolidation of control over the military and security apparatus, and selective use of coercive politics, he opted not for a wholesale removal of elder officials but for strategic alliances with key senior cadres and the honorable retirement of less useful officials. Rather than a relationship of open confrontation, the dynamic between Kim Jong Un and the old guard was closer to one of reciprocal obedience and deference.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Public Policy Research Institute Korea University
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34266/jnks.2025.11.1.41
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An assessment on power balance between Kim Jong Un and Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition in early Kim Jong Un period(2011-2016) : Focusing on changes in the composition of WPK 6th Politburo

Junhee Lee
Public Policy Research Institute Korea University
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

An assessment on power balance between Kim Jong Un and Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition in early Kim Jong Un period(2011-2016) : Focusing on changes in the composition of WPK 6th Politburo

Junhee Lee
article en

Abstract

This study argues, based on data on changes in the composition of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea, that the relationship between the inexperienced young leader Kim Jong Un and the senior elites of Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition was not adversarial. Contrary to common assumptions, the number of purges within the early Politburo under Kim Jong Un was relatively limited. Those who were purged tended to be either marginal figures within Kim Jong Il’s coalition or newly recruited members incorporated after 2009. The majority of replaced Politburo members were retired due to their advanced age, a practice applied even to key supporters of KJU. Key elite figures, including party secretaries who had formed the core of Kim Jong Il’s winning coalition, largely remained in place. While Kim Jong Un clearly asserted his leadership through the functional reorganization of the Politburo, consolidation of control over the military and security apparatus, and selective use of coercive politics, he opted not for a wholesale removal of elder officials but for strategic alliances with key senior cadres and the honorable retirement of less useful officials. Rather than a relationship of open confrontation, the dynamic between Kim Jong Un and the old guard was closer to one of reciprocal obedience and deference.

Public Policy Research Institute Korea UniversityVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.