Comparative analysis of descriptions of Lee Ki-baek’s the Discussion of Korean social development history in Korean History(1977) and the Unfolding of korean history in New Korean History(2002)

Lee Ki-bak emphasized understanding Korea's social development patterns in “the Discussion of Korean social development history” (1977). Later, in 1983, he further proposed “the theory of the intrinsic development of the nation throughout the past,” which he himself included in the What is History as one of his co-editors by acquiring knowledge of Western history through Mandelbaum's thesis, which he seems to have emphasized that the Korean people have a history of intrinsic development, especially in any civilization. In addition, as clearly revealed in Vico's view, it is believed that the Korean people also thought that just as each nation in the world developed independently, the Korean people also did. In “the Unfolding of Korean History” (2002), he saw that the social foundation of the ruling power was gradually expanded as the lower class of the ruling power used to appear as a new ruling power. He went further here and stated that history has not developed in a straight line at each period, but has been developed through several leaps in a stepwise manner, and each step has an important meaning. The biggest feature of the descriptions of “the Discussion of Korean social development history” and “the Unfolding of Korean history” is that they value “dominant power” and exclude “people.” In particular, in the latter case, this was closely related to the situation in which a series of criticisms about the so-called theory of people's history, which some of the academic circles argued at that time, were being intensively raised. It was also because he himself was very critical of the theory of people's history in that it was based on the Marx's theory of historical materialism. Another characteristic of the description of “the Unfolding of Korean history” is the arrangement based on the view of new people's nationalism. It was the first time that he specifically advocated the view of new people's nationalism based on the standard of change in the human group that took the lead in the development of Korean history. Therefore, his clarification of the view of new people's nationalism and his description of the development of Korean history from that point of view was influenced by Son Jin-tae, who himself defined the view of new people's nationalism as a representative scholar.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Society of the History of Historiography
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29186/kjhh.2025.51.155
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of descriptions of Lee Ki-baek’s the Discussion of Korean social development history in Korean History(1977) and the Unfolding of korean history in New Korean History(2002)

Yong-pil Noh
The Korean Society of the History of Historiography
Japanese History and Culture
article

Comparative analysis of descriptions of Lee Ki-baek’s the Discussion of Korean social development history in Korean History(1977) and the Unfolding of korean history in New Korean History(2002)

Yong-pil Noh
article en

Abstract

Lee Ki-bak emphasized understanding Korea's social development patterns in “the Discussion of Korean social development history” (1977). Later, in 1983, he further proposed “the theory of the intrinsic development of the nation throughout the past,” which he himself included in the What is History as one of his co-editors by acquiring knowledge of Western history through Mandelbaum's thesis, which he seems to have emphasized that the Korean people have a history of intrinsic development, especially in any civilization. In addition, as clearly revealed in Vico's view, it is believed that the Korean people also thought that just as each nation in the world developed independently, the Korean people also did. In “the Unfolding of Korean History” (2002), he saw that the social foundation of the ruling power was gradually expanded as the lower class of the ruling power used to appear as a new ruling power. He went further here and stated that history has not developed in a straight line at each period, but has been developed through several leaps in a stepwise manner, and each step has an important meaning. The biggest feature of the descriptions of “the Discussion of Korean social development history” and “the Unfolding of Korean history” is that they value “dominant power” and exclude “people.” In particular, in the latter case, this was closely related to the situation in which a series of criticisms about the so-called theory of people's history, which some of the academic circles argued at that time, were being intensively raised. It was also because he himself was very critical of the theory of people's history in that it was based on the Marx's theory of historical materialism. Another characteristic of the description of “the Unfolding of Korean history” is the arrangement based on the view of new people's nationalism. It was the first time that he specifically advocated the view of new people's nationalism based on the standard of change in the human group that took the lead in the development of Korean history. Therefore, his clarification of the view of new people's nationalism and his description of the development of Korean history from that point of view was influenced by Son Jin-tae, who himself defined the view of new people's nationalism as a representative scholar.

The Korean Society of the History of HistoriographyVol. 51
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.