Expansionary and Contractionary Fiscal Multipliers in the United States

ABSTRACT We estimate the fiscal (spending) multiplier using quarterly US data, 1981Q3–2024Q4. We define government spending shocks as actual minus expected expenditure growth, the latter obtained from the Survey of Professional Forecasters. We employ the Jordà local projections method, coupled with state dependence of parameters, with smooth transition between states. A key testable hypothesis is that the positive and negative spending shocks have numerically (as well as qualitatively) different effects. We find that multipliers of shocks differ qualitatively (in terms of cyclicality) as well as quantitatively. Multipliers are almost always above unity (and often well above). Importantly, we uncover evidence that negative shocks have stronger effects over longer periods of time in the case of the FEC multipliers and likely with the PVIR‐FM multipliers, too. Pooled‐shock estimation can seriously bias results. Additionally, there is strong evidence that the two types of shock produce almost uniformly significantly different estimated coefficients of our key estimable equation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70034
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expansionary and Contractionary Fiscal Multipliers in the United States

Panagiotis Koutroumpis, George Kapetanios, Christopher Tsoukis, Ekaterina Glebkina
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Expansionary and Contractionary Fiscal Multipliers in the United States

Panagiotis Koutroumpis, George Kapetanios, Christopher Tsoukis, Ekaterina Glebkina
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We estimate the fiscal (spending) multiplier using quarterly US data, 1981Q3–2024Q4. We define government spending shocks as actual minus expected expenditure growth, the latter obtained from the Survey of Professional Forecasters. We employ the Jordà local projections method, coupled with state dependence of parameters, with smooth transition between states. A key testable hypothesis is that the positive and negative spending shocks have numerically (as well as qualitatively) different effects. We find that multipliers of shocks differ qualitatively (in terms of cyclicality) as well as quantitatively. Multipliers are almost always above unity (and often well above). Importantly, we uncover evidence that negative shocks have stronger effects over longer periods of time in the case of the FEC multipliers and likely with the PVIR‐FM multipliers, too. Pooled‐shock estimation can seriously bias results. Additionally, there is strong evidence that the two types of shock produce almost uniformly significantly different estimated coefficients of our key estimable equation.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
King's College - North Carolina (US), Newcastle-under-Lyme College (GB), Paris School of Business (FR), Keele University (GB), Brunel University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.