One for all and all for one health: Harmonizing SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance results across a laboratory network

Reliable and comparable data from multiple laboratories are essential for networks relying on reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)-based surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genetic material in wastewater. Large-scale networks, such as those spanning Canada and the United States, depend on multiple laboratories deploying varied methods. However, the comparability of these methods and implications for data interoperability have not been rigorously examined. Split-sample results from an inter-laboratory study conducted across 15 laboratory methods over 15 rounds in Canada were analyzed. This study focused on assessing the consistency of SARS-CoV-2 signal levels, as well as an indicator of fecal content, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV). Linear mixed models and associated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied to gain insights to inter and intra-laboratory method variability. Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 signal levels were moderately concordant across laboratories, even without a single standardized protocol (ICC ≈ 0.70, p < 0.01). Laboratories generally distinguished and aligned on different levels of SARS-CoV-2 present in wastewater samples. However, assays targeting PMMoV displayed significant method-specific variability (ICC = 0.22, p < 0.01). This variability may be attributable to differences in standard quantification materials and different partitioning behaviour of PMMoV relative to SARS-CoV-2 within wastewater matrices. These results highlight the robustness of SARS-CoV-2 surveillance methods across laboratories, demonstrating reliable data comparability despite methodological differences. In contrast, PMMoV assays exhibited greater methodological variability, thereby inflating inter-lab PMMoV-normalized SARS-CoV-2 variability. This suggests the need for careful evaluation of the purpose of-and scale at-which PMMoV normalization is applied. Insights into the impacts of SARS-CoV-2 mutations on assay performance highlight the necessity of routine evaluation to ensure methods remain reliable and fit-for-purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180200
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One for all and all for one health: Harmonizing SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance results across a laboratory network

Marc Habash, David Bulir, Sarah Marttala, Kimberley Gilbride et al.
The Science of The Total Environment
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

One for all and all for one health: Harmonizing SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance results across a laboratory network

Marc Habash, David Bulir, Sarah Marttala, Kimberley Gilbride, Taylor Aris, R. Stephen Brown, Claire Oswald, Ryland Corchis-Scott, Chand S. Mangat, Richard Kibbee, Christopher Adam, Banu Örmeci, Gustavo Ybazeta, Hadi A. Dhiyebi, Jianxian Sun, Christopher T. DeGroot, Christopher J. Kyle, Ashley Gedge, Alex H. S. Chik, Minqing Ivy Yang, Hanlan McDougall, Mark R. Servos, Sarah Jane Payne, Eric J. Arts, James Knockleby, Philip Dennis, Jane J. Y. Ho, Robert Delatolla, Qiudi Geng, Élisabeth Mercier, Edgard M. Mejia, Matthew B Harnden
article en

Abstract

Reliable and comparable data from multiple laboratories are essential for networks relying on reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)-based surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genetic material in wastewater. Large-scale networks, such as those spanning Canada and the United States, depend on multiple laboratories deploying varied methods. However, the comparability of these methods and implications for data interoperability have not been rigorously examined. Split-sample results from an inter-laboratory study conducted across 15 laboratory methods over 15 rounds in Canada were analyzed. This study focused on assessing the consistency of SARS-CoV-2 signal levels, as well as an indicator of fecal content, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV). Linear mixed models and associated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied to gain insights to inter and intra-laboratory method variability. Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 signal levels were moderately concordant across laboratories, even without a single standardized protocol (ICC ≈ 0.70, p < 0.01). Laboratories generally distinguished and aligned on different levels of SARS-CoV-2 present in wastewater samples. However, assays targeting PMMoV displayed significant method-specific variability (ICC = 0.22, p < 0.01). This variability may be attributable to differences in standard quantification materials and different partitioning behaviour of PMMoV relative to SARS-CoV-2 within wastewater matrices. These results highlight the robustness of SARS-CoV-2 surveillance methods across laboratories, demonstrating reliable data comparability despite methodological differences. In contrast, PMMoV assays exhibited greater methodological variability, thereby inflating inter-lab PMMoV-normalized SARS-CoV-2 variability. This suggests the need for careful evaluation of the purpose of-and scale at-which PMMoV normalization is applied. Insights into the impacts of SARS-CoV-2 mutations on assay performance highlight the necessity of routine evaluation to ensure methods remain reliable and fit-for-purpose.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 999
Western University (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Public Health Agency of Canada (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Health Sciences North (CA), Ontario Tech University (CA), Nutreco (Canada) (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA), Trent University (CA), Carleton University (CA), University of Windsor (CA), University of Guelph (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Public Health Agency of Canada, Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.