Gaps between demand and supply of biodiversity impact finance in the Global South

This contribution seeks to fill knowledge gaps on what kinds of biodiversity impact investment models already exist, what factors are constraining biodiversity impact finance in the Global South, and what could be done to bridge the gap. The review identifies complexity, high transaction costs, unfamiliarity with the product, and shortages of bankable projects as key challenges pertaining to the financial sector. On the investors’ side, concerns often revolve around the risk–return ratio, insufficient global biodiversity data, and the lack of an international framework defining biodiversity finance. On the investees’ side, there is anxiety over power imbalances from the past finding their way into these new products, which could be detrimental, especially in areas with informal land rights. To move forward, learning platforms and training opportunities on impact finance could be provided to stakeholders, and more resources are needed for de-risking investments through blended financing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps between demand and supply of biodiversity impact finance in the Global South

Astrid Zabel, Michael Epprecht, Vong Nanhthavong
1 citations
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
article

Gaps between demand and supply of biodiversity impact finance in the Global South

Astrid Zabel, Michael Epprecht, Vong Nanhthavong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This contribution seeks to fill knowledge gaps on what kinds of biodiversity impact investment models already exist, what factors are constraining biodiversity impact finance in the Global South, and what could be done to bridge the gap. The review identifies complexity, high transaction costs, unfamiliarity with the product, and shortages of bankable projects as key challenges pertaining to the financial sector. On the investors’ side, concerns often revolve around the risk–return ratio, insufficient global biodiversity data, and the lack of an international framework defining biodiversity finance. On the investees’ side, there is anxiety over power imbalances from the past finding their way into these new products, which could be detrimental, especially in areas with informal land rights. To move forward, learning platforms and training opportunities on impact finance could be provided to stakeholders, and more resources are needed for de-risking investments through blended financing approaches.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 76
University of Bern (CH), Federal Office for the Environment (CH)
University of Bern
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.