Ureteroacopy Management of Upper Ureteral Stone

Background: Ureterolithiasis is a common ailment that has a big effect on health around the world. It can be hard to cure large upper ureteric stones, especially those that are bigger than 10 mm. Surgery is often needed. Ureteroscopy, both antegrade and retrograde, has become a way to treat patients, but the results of the surgery vary. This study looks at the results of two different types of surgery for treating big stones in the upper ureter: antegrade flexible ureteroscopy (AFU) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). AFU had a lower operative duration than RIRS and a shorter time to break up stones. The AFU group stayed in the hospital for a much less time than the RIRS group. There were no major differences in the stone-free rates at 24 hours or 4 weeks or in the requirement for extra treatments or problems after surgery. Conclusions: Both AFU and RIRS work well to treat big stones in the upper ureter. AFU had benefits like shorter surgery times, shorter times for breaking up stones, and a quicker recovery, but the differences in stone-free rates and complication profiles were not statistically significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2025.397920.4021
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ureteroacopy Management of Upper Ureteral Stone

L. Elbendary, Ahmed Eliwa, Osama Mostafa Kamhawy, Tarek Shaker Belhassan Boayad
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Ureteroacopy Management of Upper Ureteral Stone

L. Elbendary, Ahmed Eliwa, Osama Mostafa Kamhawy, Tarek Shaker Belhassan Boayad
article en

Abstract

Background: Ureterolithiasis is a common ailment that has a big effect on health around the world. It can be hard to cure large upper ureteric stones, especially those that are bigger than 10 mm. Surgery is often needed. Ureteroscopy, both antegrade and retrograde, has become a way to treat patients, but the results of the surgery vary. This study looks at the results of two different types of surgery for treating big stones in the upper ureter: antegrade flexible ureteroscopy (AFU) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). AFU had a lower operative duration than RIRS and a shorter time to break up stones. The AFU group stayed in the hospital for a much less time than the RIRS group. There were no major differences in the stone-free rates at 24 hours or 4 weeks or in the requirement for extra treatments or problems after surgery. Conclusions: Both AFU and RIRS work well to treat big stones in the upper ureter. AFU had benefits like shorter surgery times, shorter times for breaking up stones, and a quicker recovery, but the differences in stone-free rates and complication profiles were not statistically significant.

Zagazig University Medical JournalVol. 0(0)
Zagazig University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ureteroacopy Management of Upper Ureteral Stone — L. Elbendary, Ahmed Eliwa, et al. · Zagazig University Medical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS