Comparative analysis of the extent of protein–protein interactions in icosahedral viral capsids

Nonenveloped viruses package, carry, and deliver their genomes to the targeted cells using protein shells known as capsids. The viral capsids come in different shapes and sizes, most exhibiting helical or icosahedral symmetries. Here, we analyzed 634 icosahedral capsids at high resolution (<4 Å) from 39 virus families with T-numbers ranging from 1 to 9 and evaluated the aggregated buried surface areas (BSAs) at the unique interfaces as a measure of capsid strength and protein-protein interactions (PPIs). The BSAs were further analyzed relative to their capsid diameters and the calculated molecular weight (MW) of coat protein subunits (CPs) occupying the icosahedral asymmetric unit (IAU). Our results show that naturally occurring viral capsids exhibit stronger PPIs relative to non-native and/or engineered capsids. Interestingly, the "T = 2" capsids cluster distinctly, exhibiting weaker PPIs relative to their capsid size and subunit MWs. Furthermore, the normalized BSAs by the MW of the CPs present in the IAU are fairly constant across different capsids, suggesting that the extent of the PPIs is proportional to the CP size with a few exceptions (e.g., "T = 2" capsids). We also identified the range of capsid diameters and MWs of CPs forming different T = number capsids, which suggest a CP of 30-50 kDa can be used to build any quasi-equivalent capsid with T-numbers 1-9. Furthermore, we identified the strongest capsids available at various diameters at 25 Å intervals. Taken together, in addition to the targeting specificities, the results from this study are useful for choosing viral capsids for biomedical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Protein Science
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70257
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of the extent of protein–protein interactions in icosahedral viral capsids

Vijay Reddy, Oscar Rojas Labra, Nives Zimmerman
1 citations
Protein Science
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
1.72
article

Comparative analysis of the extent of protein–protein interactions in icosahedral viral capsids

Vijay Reddy, Oscar Rojas Labra, Nives Zimmerman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nonenveloped viruses package, carry, and deliver their genomes to the targeted cells using protein shells known as capsids. The viral capsids come in different shapes and sizes, most exhibiting helical or icosahedral symmetries. Here, we analyzed 634 icosahedral capsids at high resolution (<4 Å) from 39 virus families with T-numbers ranging from 1 to 9 and evaluated the aggregated buried surface areas (BSAs) at the unique interfaces as a measure of capsid strength and protein-protein interactions (PPIs). The BSAs were further analyzed relative to their capsid diameters and the calculated molecular weight (MW) of coat protein subunits (CPs) occupying the icosahedral asymmetric unit (IAU). Our results show that naturally occurring viral capsids exhibit stronger PPIs relative to non-native and/or engineered capsids. Interestingly, the "T = 2" capsids cluster distinctly, exhibiting weaker PPIs relative to their capsid size and subunit MWs. Furthermore, the normalized BSAs by the MW of the CPs present in the IAU are fairly constant across different capsids, suggesting that the extent of the PPIs is proportional to the CP size with a few exceptions (e.g., "T = 2" capsids). We also identified the range of capsid diameters and MWs of CPs forming different T = number capsids, which suggest a CP of 30-50 kDa can be used to build any quasi-equivalent capsid with T-numbers 1-9. Furthermore, we identified the strongest capsids available at various diameters at 25 Å intervals. Taken together, in addition to the targeting specificities, the results from this study are useful for choosing viral capsids for biomedical applications.

Protein ScienceVol. 34(9)
Scripps Research Institute (US), University of Minnesota (US), Hormel (United States) (US)
Hormel Foundation, University of Minnesota
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.