In Vivo Irritation and Sensitization Assessment of Cypermethrin, Pymetrozine, and Indoxacarb–Emamectin Benzoate Combination in Test Animals

Insecticides are widely used to protect agricultural and plantation products from pests and plant-disrupting organisms. Prior to market distribution, pesticide-containing products must undergo safety evaluations, including assessments of potential skin and eye irritation and allergic responses. In this study, we conducted one of the first comparative in vivo evaluations of commercial insecticidal formulations containing cypermethrin (Gusano 300 EC), pymetrozine (Vorum 50 WG), and indoxacarb-emamectin benzoate (Endorse Plus 160/20 OD) using internationally recognized protocols based on OECD 404 (skin irritation), OECD 405 (eye irritation), and OECD 406 (skin sensitization). The results showed that the cypermethrin formulation caused minimal skin irritation, mild eye irritation, and skin sensitization. The pymetrozine formulation did not cause skin irritation or sensitization but induced mild eye irritation. The indoxacarb-emamectin Benzoate formulation caused mild eye irritation and skin sensitization, with minimal skin irritation. These findings contribute novel data to the toxicological profile of these pesticide formulations and support future safety evaluations and regulatory assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Toxicology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jt/1282928
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vivo Irritation and Sensitization Assessment of Cypermethrin, Pymetrozine, and Indoxacarb–Emamectin Benzoate Combination in Test Animals

Gofarana Wilar, Wahyu Daradjat Natawigena, Cecep Suhandi, Agus Susanto et al.
Journal of Toxicology
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
article

In Vivo Irritation and Sensitization Assessment of Cypermethrin, Pymetrozine, and Indoxacarb–Emamectin Benzoate Combination in Test Animals

Gofarana Wilar, Wahyu Daradjat Natawigena, Cecep Suhandi, Agus Susanto, Muhammad Ilfadry Rifasta, Kirana Fayruz Swarga, Gloria Mahayarni Lastiar Sitinjak
article en

Abstract

Insecticides are widely used to protect agricultural and plantation products from pests and plant-disrupting organisms. Prior to market distribution, pesticide-containing products must undergo safety evaluations, including assessments of potential skin and eye irritation and allergic responses. In this study, we conducted one of the first comparative in vivo evaluations of commercial insecticidal formulations containing cypermethrin (Gusano 300 EC), pymetrozine (Vorum 50 WG), and indoxacarb-emamectin benzoate (Endorse Plus 160/20 OD) using internationally recognized protocols based on OECD 404 (skin irritation), OECD 405 (eye irritation), and OECD 406 (skin sensitization). The results showed that the cypermethrin formulation caused minimal skin irritation, mild eye irritation, and skin sensitization. The pymetrozine formulation did not cause skin irritation or sensitization but induced mild eye irritation. The indoxacarb-emamectin Benzoate formulation caused mild eye irritation and skin sensitization, with minimal skin irritation. These findings contribute novel data to the toxicological profile of these pesticide formulations and support future safety evaluations and regulatory assessments.

Journal of ToxicologyVol. 2025(1)
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Universitas Padjadjaran
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.