„[I]ch sehe jedes Problem von einem religiösen Standpunkt.”

Abstract “I cannot help seeing every problem from a religious point of view.” Does Wittgenstein offer a religious critique of progress? This article examines Ludwig Wittgenstein’s critique of the modern ideology of progress and its relation to religion. Wittgenstein, having a deep interest in the Christian religion, sees his philosophical quest for clarity as a self-sufficient ethical act, rather than a means to an end, and understands this attitude not only as fundamentally opposed to modernity, but also as ‘religious’ in some sense. Against first appearances, however, Wittgenstein’s criticism of modernity cannot be attributed to a Christian-conservative type. His decidedly anti-dogmatic understanding of the Christian religion, mainly shaped by dissident Christian thinkers such as Tolstoi and Kierkegaard, is anything but traditional. The article concludes by suggesting that Wittgenstein’s ideas of Christianity and of being ‘religious’, though ethically powerful, remain disengaged from the habitual, ritual and narrative character of lived Christian practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wittgenstein-Studien
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2025-0015
Primary Topic
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

„[I]ch sehe jedes Problem von einem religiösen Standpunkt.”

Andreas Krebs
Wittgenstein-Studien
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
article

„[I]ch sehe jedes Problem von einem religiösen Standpunkt.”

Andreas Krebs
article en

Abstract

Abstract “I cannot help seeing every problem from a religious point of view.” Does Wittgenstein offer a religious critique of progress? This article examines Ludwig Wittgenstein’s critique of the modern ideology of progress and its relation to religion. Wittgenstein, having a deep interest in the Christian religion, sees his philosophical quest for clarity as a self-sufficient ethical act, rather than a means to an end, and understands this attitude not only as fundamentally opposed to modernity, but also as ‘religious’ in some sense. Against first appearances, however, Wittgenstein’s criticism of modernity cannot be attributed to a Christian-conservative type. His decidedly anti-dogmatic understanding of the Christian religion, mainly shaped by dissident Christian thinkers such as Tolstoi and Kierkegaard, is anything but traditional. The article concludes by suggesting that Wittgenstein’s ideas of Christianity and of being ‘religious’, though ethically powerful, remain disengaged from the habitual, ritual and narrative character of lived Christian practice.

Wittgenstein-StudienVol. 16(1)
University of Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.