Detecting Midjourney-Generated Images: An Eye-Tracking Study
This study investigated human performance in identifying AI-generated images. In a speeded forced-choice task, 255 participants viewed paired images (one real, one AI-generated by Midjourney) of standard or futuristic cars and buildings and had to identify the AI-generated one, while eye movements were recorded using an eye-tracker. Results revealed a powerful “futurism-as-artificiality” heuristic. Specifically, participants performed poorly (55% correct) when an AI-generated standard image was paired with a real futuristic image. Conversely, accuracy was high (91% correct) when the AI-generated futuristic image was paired with a real standard image. Participants’ gaze landed first on the AI-generated image more often when it depicted a futuristic design than when it depicted a standard one. The demonstrated heuristic presents a double-edged sword for information veracity: it may lead to the uncritical acceptance of AI-generated misinformation that appears conventional, while simultaneously causing real forward-thinking designs to be dismissed as fake.
Authors
- Dimitra Dodou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9428-3261)
- Joost de Winter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-8200)
- Jochen Pfeifer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-6285)
- Yke Bauke Eisma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3437-2761)
Institutions
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251363209
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.43