World Culture of Memory: Origins, Prospects, Responsibility

This paper analyzes the phenomenon of the so-called “global culture of memory” that emerged in the second half of the 20th century and early 21st century. The author critically examines the idea of the universality of this culture, demonstrating its genetic connection with Western European and North American historical experience. The paper also analyzes the transformation of the memory of the Holocaust into a global moral paradigm and the institutional mechanisms for its dissemination. In response to the challenges and risks of the globalization of memory, the paper touches upon the historical memory policy of contemporary Russia. This policy is inter-preted not as a “vacuum” (isolated) project, but as a purposeful strategy to assert the right to its own sovereign interpretation of the national past, to build its own hierarchy of significant events, and to form a national identity based on its own historical narrative. The article analyzes the key points of divergence between the Russian and dominant Western approaches to memory, and raises the question of the forms and limits of responsibility in the era of hybrid wars.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Общество политика экономика право
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2025.8.11
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

World Culture of Memory: Origins, Prospects, Responsibility

Ivan A. Legostaev
Общество политика экономика право
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

World Culture of Memory: Origins, Prospects, Responsibility

Ivan A. Legostaev
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the phenomenon of the so-called “global culture of memory” that emerged in the second half of the 20th century and early 21st century. The author critically examines the idea of the universality of this culture, demonstrating its genetic connection with Western European and North American historical experience. The paper also analyzes the transformation of the memory of the Holocaust into a global moral paradigm and the institutional mechanisms for its dissemination. In response to the challenges and risks of the globalization of memory, the paper touches upon the historical memory policy of contemporary Russia. This policy is inter-preted not as a “vacuum” (isolated) project, but as a purposeful strategy to assert the right to its own sovereign interpretation of the national past, to build its own hierarchy of significant events, and to form a national identity based on its own historical narrative. The article analyzes the key points of divergence between the Russian and dominant Western approaches to memory, and raises the question of the forms and limits of responsibility in the era of hybrid wars.

Общество политика экономика право(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

World Culture of Memory: Origins, Prospects, Responsibility — Ivan A. Legostaev · Общество политика экономика право (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS