Institutional reforms scenarios for Hungarian territorial communities: Comparative analysis of Romania, Slovakia and Serbia

Introduction: Romania, Slovakia and Serbia are nation states in which significant Hungarian ethnic territorial communities are settled. The communities are regularly articulating regionalist demands for granting/expansion of autonomy and minority rights. Thus, the states are faced with the challenge of managing such political-territorial heterogeneity, which is an important research topic. The subject of this article is the institutional management of political-territorial heterogeneity in relation to Hungarian ethnic minorities by the national center in Romania, Serbia and Slovakia. The research focuses on institutional reforms for the management of political-territorial heterogeneity in Romania, Slovakia and Serbia, concerning the Hungarian ethnic community as a territorial community. Objectives: to determine the scenarios of institutional reform as a mechanism for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in relation to Hungarian communities used by the national governments of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia in the period 1990–2020s. Methods: comparative small-N analysis, comparative-oriented case study. Results: cases of institutional reforms as a mechanism for managing political-territorial heterogeneity regarding the Hungarian territorial communities demonstrate different scenarios: the national governments of Romania and Slovakia demonstrate similar scenarios (European integration as a significant incentive, limited pragmatic decentralization, territorial reconfiguration to limit the structural power of the Hungarian community, similar institutional formats of subnational units autonomies ); Serbia stands out for its own structural and institutional specifics (virtual absence of external incentives, orientation towards the Hungarian community and regionalist actors, a clear vision of the institutional configuration of the autonomy). Conclusions: the studied scenarios of institutional reform are mechanisms for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in Romania, Slovakia and Serbia and contribute to the elimination of threats to territorial integrity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ARS ADMINISTRANDI (Искусство управления)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2025-2-295-320
Primary Topic
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional reforms scenarios for Hungarian territorial communities: Comparative analysis of Romania, Slovakia and Serbia

Mikhail V. Grabevnik
ARS ADMINISTRANDI (Искусство управления)
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
article

Institutional reforms scenarios for Hungarian territorial communities: Comparative analysis of Romania, Slovakia and Serbia

Mikhail V. Grabevnik
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Romania, Slovakia and Serbia are nation states in which significant Hungarian ethnic territorial communities are settled. The communities are regularly articulating regionalist demands for granting/expansion of autonomy and minority rights. Thus, the states are faced with the challenge of managing such political-territorial heterogeneity, which is an important research topic. The subject of this article is the institutional management of political-territorial heterogeneity in relation to Hungarian ethnic minorities by the national center in Romania, Serbia and Slovakia. The research focuses on institutional reforms for the management of political-territorial heterogeneity in Romania, Slovakia and Serbia, concerning the Hungarian ethnic community as a territorial community. Objectives: to determine the scenarios of institutional reform as a mechanism for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in relation to Hungarian communities used by the national governments of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia in the period 1990–2020s. Methods: comparative small-N analysis, comparative-oriented case study. Results: cases of institutional reforms as a mechanism for managing political-territorial heterogeneity regarding the Hungarian territorial communities demonstrate different scenarios: the national governments of Romania and Slovakia demonstrate similar scenarios (European integration as a significant incentive, limited pragmatic decentralization, territorial reconfiguration to limit the structural power of the Hungarian community, similar institutional formats of subnational units autonomies ); Serbia stands out for its own structural and institutional specifics (virtual absence of external incentives, orientation towards the Hungarian community and regionalist actors, a clear vision of the institutional configuration of the autonomy). Conclusions: the studied scenarios of institutional reform are mechanisms for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in Romania, Slovakia and Serbia and contribute to the elimination of threats to territorial integrity.

ARS ADMINISTRANDI (Искусство управления)Vol. 17(2)
Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.