Ultrasound Pattern of Intramuscular Polymethylmethacrylate in Gluteal Augmentation

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) microspheres have gained popularity as a permanent filler for gluteal augmentation due to their biostimulatory properties. Although ultrasonography is routinely employed to evaluate dermal fillers, descriptions of PMMA's intramuscular ultrasound signature remain scarce. Herein, we report the characteristic sonographic features observed in 40 female patients who underwent intramuscular PMMA injections, highlighting the diagnostic utility of high-resolution ultrasound in this context. We conducted an observational, descriptive study at a dermatological ultrasound clinic in São Paulo, Brazil, between June 2023 and October 2024. Approved by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP), number 0398, at Blanc Hospital São Paulo. Inclusion criteria comprised female patients aged 20–65 years who received PMMA (30% concentration; Biossimetric or Linnea Safe) in the gluteus maximus and/or medius 1 month prior. Exclusion criteria included autoimmune disorders, pregnancy, or injection of other substances in the gluteal region. Ultrasound examinations utilized a GE LOGIQ machine with both 6–15 MHz linear and 4–6 MHz convex transducers. The gluteal area was divided into four quadrants, and eight representative cases were selected to illustrate typical findings. Ultrasonographically, subcutaneous PMMA deposition appeared as ill-defined, hyperechoic regions with spiculated margins and numerous punctate echoes generating comet-tail reverberations. Posterior acoustic shadowing was consistently observed due to high attenuation of the filler [1, 2]. In the muscular plane, PMMA induced diffuse echogenic enhancement and obliteration of the normal fibrillar pattern of muscle fibers. High-frequency linear imaging (6–15 MHz) delineated loss of muscle fascicle definition beneath the hyperechoic fascia, whereas convex transducers (4–6 MHz) confirmed these changes at greater depth (Figures 1, 2 and 3). These ultrasonographic signatures—spiculated hyperechoic zones, comet-tail artifacts, and acoustic shadows—mirror those reported for subcutaneous PMMA but are here demonstrated within the muscle compartment [3]. The obliteration of the muscle's fibrillar architecture likely reflects both the bulk presence of microspheres and associated early collagen deposition, paralleling histologic findings of granulomatous encapsulation and fibroplasia [4, 5]. Accurate recognition of these patterns enables differentiation of PMMA from other fillers and from pathological processes such as panniculitis or fluid collections, thereby facilitating timely management of complications. Our observations underscore the indispensability of high-resolution ultrasound for pre-procedure product diagnostics in patients who already have other fillers and in monitoring possible complications. Given the rising global demand for cosmetic gluteal enhancement [6], practitioners should be familiar with the sonographic hallmarks of intramuscular PMMA to optimize patient safety and to guide intervention when adverse events arise. In conclusion, subcutaneous PMMA in gluteal augmentation produces distinct ultrasound patterns characterized by poorly defined hyperechoic foci with comet-tail reverberations and posterior acoustic shadowing. Although global echogenicity augmentation and loss of the normal muscular fibrillar pattern are seen in the intramuscular PMMA, recognition of these features on both linear and convex transducers is critical for accurate assessment and monitoring of patients undergoing permanent filler injections. Eliza Porciuncula Justo Ducati: contributed to the search for scientific articles, the writing of this article, the review of the content and the suggestion of revisions, the conduct and analysis of imaging examinations, and the description of ultrasonographic findings. Ximena Wortsman: contributed her expertise by reviewing the content and suggesting revisions. Gabriel de Sousa Lima: contributed to the search for scientific articles and the writing of this article. Camila Souza de Araujo Guarinello: contributed to the search for scientific articles and the writing of this article. Finishing this scientific article is not just the end of a lot of hard work, it is also the result of the invaluable support and contributions of many people and institutions, to whom I am deeply grateful. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Ximena, an expert in medical radiology, for her guidance, knowledge, and dedication. Her expertise was instrumental to this study, and her contributions have added immeasurable value to the research. I am also deeply grateful to Blanc Hospital, the main sponsor of this project, for their support and encouragement of scientific research. Their commitment to advancing knowledge in the health sector was fundamental to the completion of this article. To God, for giving me strength, wisdom, and perseverance along the way. To my family, who have always been by my side, offering love, unconditional support, and encouragement, especially in the toughest moments. I could not have done this without you. My most sincere gratitude to all! The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Research data are not shared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70415
Primary Topic
Body Contouring and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound Pattern of Intramuscular Polymethylmethacrylate in Gluteal Augmentation

Ximena Wortsman, Gabriel de Sousa Lima, Eliza Porciuncula Justo Ducati, Camila Souza de Araujo Guarinello
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Body Contouring and Surgery
article

Ultrasound Pattern of Intramuscular Polymethylmethacrylate in Gluteal Augmentation

Ximena Wortsman, Gabriel de Sousa Lima, Eliza Porciuncula Justo Ducati, Camila Souza de Araujo Guarinello
article en

Abstract

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) microspheres have gained popularity as a permanent filler for gluteal augmentation due to their biostimulatory properties. Although ultrasonography is routinely employed to evaluate dermal fillers, descriptions of PMMA's intramuscular ultrasound signature remain scarce. Herein, we report the characteristic sonographic features observed in 40 female patients who underwent intramuscular PMMA injections, highlighting the diagnostic utility of high-resolution ultrasound in this context. We conducted an observational, descriptive study at a dermatological ultrasound clinic in São Paulo, Brazil, between June 2023 and October 2024. Approved by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP), number 0398, at Blanc Hospital São Paulo. Inclusion criteria comprised female patients aged 20–65 years who received PMMA (30% concentration; Biossimetric or Linnea Safe) in the gluteus maximus and/or medius 1 month prior. Exclusion criteria included autoimmune disorders, pregnancy, or injection of other substances in the gluteal region. Ultrasound examinations utilized a GE LOGIQ machine with both 6–15 MHz linear and 4–6 MHz convex transducers. The gluteal area was divided into four quadrants, and eight representative cases were selected to illustrate typical findings. Ultrasonographically, subcutaneous PMMA deposition appeared as ill-defined, hyperechoic regions with spiculated margins and numerous punctate echoes generating comet-tail reverberations. Posterior acoustic shadowing was consistently observed due to high attenuation of the filler [1, 2]. In the muscular plane, PMMA induced diffuse echogenic enhancement and obliteration of the normal fibrillar pattern of muscle fibers. High-frequency linear imaging (6–15 MHz) delineated loss of muscle fascicle definition beneath the hyperechoic fascia, whereas convex transducers (4–6 MHz) confirmed these changes at greater depth (Figures 1, 2 and 3). These ultrasonographic signatures—spiculated hyperechoic zones, comet-tail artifacts, and acoustic shadows—mirror those reported for subcutaneous PMMA but are here demonstrated within the muscle compartment [3]. The obliteration of the muscle's fibrillar architecture likely reflects both the bulk presence of microspheres and associated early collagen deposition, paralleling histologic findings of granulomatous encapsulation and fibroplasia [4, 5]. Accurate recognition of these patterns enables differentiation of PMMA from other fillers and from pathological processes such as panniculitis or fluid collections, thereby facilitating timely management of complications. Our observations underscore the indispensability of high-resolution ultrasound for pre-procedure product diagnostics in patients who already have other fillers and in monitoring possible complications. Given the rising global demand for cosmetic gluteal enhancement [6], practitioners should be familiar with the sonographic hallmarks of intramuscular PMMA to optimize patient safety and to guide intervention when adverse events arise. In conclusion, subcutaneous PMMA in gluteal augmentation produces distinct ultrasound patterns characterized by poorly defined hyperechoic foci with comet-tail reverberations and posterior acoustic shadowing. Although global echogenicity augmentation and loss of the normal muscular fibrillar pattern are seen in the intramuscular PMMA, recognition of these features on both linear and convex transducers is critical for accurate assessment and monitoring of patients undergoing permanent filler injections. Eliza Porciuncula Justo Ducati: contributed to the search for scientific articles, the writing of this article, the review of the content and the suggestion of revisions, the conduct and analysis of imaging examinations, and the description of ultrasonographic findings. Ximena Wortsman: contributed her expertise by reviewing the content and suggesting revisions. Gabriel de Sousa Lima: contributed to the search for scientific articles and the writing of this article. Camila Souza de Araujo Guarinello: contributed to the search for scientific articles and the writing of this article. Finishing this scientific article is not just the end of a lot of hard work, it is also the result of the invaluable support and contributions of many people and institutions, to whom I am deeply grateful. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Ximena, an expert in medical radiology, for her guidance, knowledge, and dedication. Her expertise was instrumental to this study, and her contributions have added immeasurable value to the research. I am also deeply grateful to Blanc Hospital, the main sponsor of this project, for their support and encouragement of scientific research. Their commitment to advancing knowledge in the health sector was fundamental to the completion of this article. To God, for giving me strength, wisdom, and perseverance along the way. To my family, who have always been by my side, offering love, unconditional support, and encouragement, especially in the toughest moments. I could not have done this without you. My most sincere gratitude to all! The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Research data are not shared.

Journal of Cosmetic DermatologyVol. 24(9)
Institute for Diagnostic Imaging and Research of the Skin and Soft Tissues (CL), Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (BR), Hospital São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Body Contouring and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.