Indonesian and English sentence patterns: A contrastive syntactic perspective

In learning a foreign language, comprehending similarities and differences between the source language and the target language is crucial to become proficient in the target language. This scientifically can be done by contrasting the two languages. This research aims to contrast two languages, Indonesian language as the source language and English language as the target language. This study contrasts Indonesian and English by examining simple declarative sentence patterns, with the aim of outlining their similarities and differences. The scope of the investigation is limited to the comparison of simple declarative sentence patterns in both languages. The primary objective of this study is to identify and describe the similarities and differences in simple declarative constructions across the two linguistic systems. The Contrastive Analysis method is used to contrast the patterns of sentence structure in both languages. Declarative sentences are categorized into transitive, ditransitive, intransitive, nominal, adjectival, prepositional, and numeral patterns. The result of this study reveals that Indonesian and English share declarative patterns in transitive, ditransitive, and intransitive forms, while differing in nominal, adjectival, prepositional, and numeral types. Simple declarative sentences in Indonesian and English share several structural patterns in transitive, ditransitive, and intransitive constructions. However, Indonesian also allows nominal, adjectival, prepositional, and numeral declarative sentences, which employ complements as predicates and are not found in English. Conversely, English exhibits patterns absent in Indonesian; those formed with intensive verbs (to be) functioning as the predicate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistics Initiative
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52341
Primary Topic
English Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indonesian and English sentence patterns: A contrastive syntactic perspective

Anita Kusumawati
Linguistics Initiative
English Language Learning and Teaching
article

Indonesian and English sentence patterns: A contrastive syntactic perspective

Anita Kusumawati
article en

Abstract

In learning a foreign language, comprehending similarities and differences between the source language and the target language is crucial to become proficient in the target language. This scientifically can be done by contrasting the two languages. This research aims to contrast two languages, Indonesian language as the source language and English language as the target language. This study contrasts Indonesian and English by examining simple declarative sentence patterns, with the aim of outlining their similarities and differences. The scope of the investigation is limited to the comparison of simple declarative sentence patterns in both languages. The primary objective of this study is to identify and describe the similarities and differences in simple declarative constructions across the two linguistic systems. The Contrastive Analysis method is used to contrast the patterns of sentence structure in both languages. Declarative sentences are categorized into transitive, ditransitive, intransitive, nominal, adjectival, prepositional, and numeral patterns. The result of this study reveals that Indonesian and English share declarative patterns in transitive, ditransitive, and intransitive forms, while differing in nominal, adjectival, prepositional, and numeral types. Simple declarative sentences in Indonesian and English share several structural patterns in transitive, ditransitive, and intransitive constructions. However, Indonesian also allows nominal, adjectival, prepositional, and numeral declarative sentences, which employ complements as predicates and are not found in English. Conversely, English exhibits patterns absent in Indonesian; those formed with intensive verbs (to be) functioning as the predicate.

Linguistics InitiativeVol. 5(2)
Universitas Pamulang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
English Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.