Gig Economy Workers’ Rights: Legal Classification and Social Protection in Digital Labour Markets

Background: The rapid growth of digital labour platforms has created a new category of workers who fall outside traditional employment classifications, leaving millions without adequate legal protection and social benefits. This research examines the legal challenges surrounding gig economy workers’ rights and the evolving frameworks for their protection. Objective: To analyse the legal classification of gig workers across different jurisdictions, evaluate existing social protection mechanisms, and propose framework improvements that balance flexibility with worker protection in digital labour markets. Methods: This qualitative study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining doctrinal legal analysis of legislation and case law from multiple jurisdictions with semi-structured interviews of 45 stakeholders, including gig workers, platform representatives, legal experts, and policymakers. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in legal approaches and protection gaps. Findings: Four major themes emerged: (1) Current binary employment classifications fail to capture the reality of gig work relationships; (2) Significant disparities exist in social protection access between traditional employees and gig workers; (3) Platform algorithms create new forms of control that challenge traditional employment tests; (4) Emerging hybrid classification models show promise but face implementation challenges. Courts increasingly recognize platform control mechanisms, yet regulatory responses remain fragmented. Conclusion: The study reveals an urgent need for legal frameworks that move beyond binary employee/contractor classifications. Recommendations include developing intermediate worker categories, portable benefits systems, algorithmic transparency requirements, and collective bargaining mechanisms adapted for digital labor markets. Success requires coordinated policy action balancing innovation with fundamental worker protections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Societal Studies
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61424/ijlss.v2i1.379
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gig Economy Workers’ Rights: Legal Classification and Social Protection in Digital Labour Markets

Nicki James Shepherd
1 citations
International Journal of Law and Societal Studies
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
article

Gig Economy Workers’ Rights: Legal Classification and Social Protection in Digital Labour Markets

Nicki James Shepherd
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The rapid growth of digital labour platforms has created a new category of workers who fall outside traditional employment classifications, leaving millions without adequate legal protection and social benefits. This research examines the legal challenges surrounding gig economy workers’ rights and the evolving frameworks for their protection. Objective: To analyse the legal classification of gig workers across different jurisdictions, evaluate existing social protection mechanisms, and propose framework improvements that balance flexibility with worker protection in digital labour markets. Methods: This qualitative study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining doctrinal legal analysis of legislation and case law from multiple jurisdictions with semi-structured interviews of 45 stakeholders, including gig workers, platform representatives, legal experts, and policymakers. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in legal approaches and protection gaps. Findings: Four major themes emerged: (1) Current binary employment classifications fail to capture the reality of gig work relationships; (2) Significant disparities exist in social protection access between traditional employees and gig workers; (3) Platform algorithms create new forms of control that challenge traditional employment tests; (4) Emerging hybrid classification models show promise but face implementation challenges. Courts increasingly recognize platform control mechanisms, yet regulatory responses remain fragmented. Conclusion: The study reveals an urgent need for legal frameworks that move beyond binary employee/contractor classifications. Recommendations include developing intermediate worker categories, portable benefits systems, algorithmic transparency requirements, and collective bargaining mechanisms adapted for digital labor markets. Success requires coordinated policy action balancing innovation with fundamental worker protections.

International Journal of Law and Societal StudiesVol. 2(1)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gig Economy Workers’ Rights: Legal Classification and Social Protection in Digital Labour Markets — Nicki James Shepherd · International Journal of Law and Societal Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS