Assessing the psychosocial impact of mobility assistive technology on women Veterans

Introduction: Despite the growing number of women Veterans with disabilities, data on how well mobility assistive technology (MAT) meets their needs are limited. Evaluating psychosocial impact is key to ensuring that MAT not only meets physical needs but also fosters social participation, mental well-being, and independence. The aim of this study was to examine the perceived psychosocial impact of using MAT on women Veterans’ competence, adaptability, and self-esteem. Methods: Women Veterans (N = 501) who received MAT from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs within the past five years completed a national online survey including the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Women were asked to score the PIADS on the basis of their experiences using their primary device type: cane, leg-foot orthosis, walker, power wheelchair (PWC), scooters, manual wheelchair (MWC), or crutches. Results: Participants expressed an overall positive psychosocial impact of MAT on competence (mean = 1.03, SD = 1.23), adaptability (mean = 0.76, SD = 1.43), and self-esteem (mean = 0.67, SD = 1.22). Around 17% of the total item responses indicated a negative perceived psychosocial impact of using MAT. PWC users’ item scores indicated higher positive psychosocial impact than those of other device-type users (0.001 < p < 0.023). Discussion: Despite the overall positive psychosocial benefits of MAT, use was associated with feelings of low self-esteem, frustration, and embarrassment. The results highlight a possible mental health benefit for PWC users compared with other MAT users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2024-0091
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the psychosocial impact of mobility assistive technology on women Veterans

Rupa Banerjee, Brad E. Dicianno, Alicia M Koontz, Rutuja A. Kulkarni et al.
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Assessing the psychosocial impact of mobility assistive technology on women Veterans

Rupa Banerjee, Brad E. Dicianno, Alicia M Koontz, Rutuja A. Kulkarni, Frances M. Weaver, Pooja Solanki, Kelsey Berryman
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the growing number of women Veterans with disabilities, data on how well mobility assistive technology (MAT) meets their needs are limited. Evaluating psychosocial impact is key to ensuring that MAT not only meets physical needs but also fosters social participation, mental well-being, and independence. The aim of this study was to examine the perceived psychosocial impact of using MAT on women Veterans’ competence, adaptability, and self-esteem. Methods: Women Veterans (N = 501) who received MAT from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs within the past five years completed a national online survey including the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Women were asked to score the PIADS on the basis of their experiences using their primary device type: cane, leg-foot orthosis, walker, power wheelchair (PWC), scooters, manual wheelchair (MWC), or crutches. Results: Participants expressed an overall positive psychosocial impact of MAT on competence (mean = 1.03, SD = 1.23), adaptability (mean = 0.76, SD = 1.43), and self-esteem (mean = 0.67, SD = 1.22). Around 17% of the total item responses indicated a negative perceived psychosocial impact of using MAT. PWC users’ item scores indicated higher positive psychosocial impact than those of other device-type users (0.001 < p < 0.023). Discussion: Despite the overall positive psychosocial benefits of MAT, use was associated with feelings of low self-esteem, frustration, and embarrassment. The results highlight a possible mental health benefit for PWC users compared with other MAT users.

Journal of Military Veteran and Family HealthVol. 11(4)
University of Toronto (CA), Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.