A data-driven framework for railroad accident analysis based on the CRISP-DM and association rule mining: Empirical evidence from the federal railroad administration (2020–2024)

• 12,123 U.S. rail accidents (2020–2024) analyzed via CRISP-DM and Apriori ARM. • 705 rules with Lift > 1 grouped into Derailments, Crossings, and Other Impacts. • Derailments (51.9%) are mainly attributed to switch failure and human error. • Severe risks linked to hot, clear weather with or without active signalization. • High-risk months: June, September; critical states: Florida, Missouri, and California. The railway industry is a critical component of global transportation, yet it faces persistent safety challenges resulting in significant human and financial costs. While previous studies have investigated individual accident factors, the complex interactions among human, environmental, and organizational elements remain underexplored. To address this gap, the present study adopts a comprehensive, data-driven approach using the Cross-Industries Standard Processing for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology to analyze 12,123 accident records from the United States Federal Railroad Administration (U.S. FRA) between 2020 and 2024. Descriptive trend analysis identified 2022 as the year with the highest human casualties and 2023 with the greatest financial losses. The Apriori algorithm was employed to extract 912 valid association rules. A Pareto-based prioritization yielded 705 high-lift and high-confidence rules, which were further refined through semantic pruning and validated via a 10-fold subsampling test. The rules were categorized into three main accident types: Derailments, Highway-Rail Crossings, and Other Impacts. Key findings reveal strong associations between severe accidents and conditions such as high temperatures, low visibility, and lack of signalization—particularly at highway-rail crossings. Some rule combinations demonstrated Lift values exceeding 3.2 and Confidence scores of 1.0, underscoring consistent, high-risk patterns. Spatiotemporal heatmaps further identified critical hotspots in Florida, Missouri, and California, with elevated accident rates in June and September. Visual analyses through scatter plots, heatmaps, and treemaps supported the extraction of interpretable, actionable insights. The study emphasizes the need for integrated, multi-factor safety interventions and provides a foundation for data-driven policymaking aimed at reducing railway accidents and improving systemic resilience in transportation networks . The Data-Driven Framework for Railway Accident Analysis

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106825
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A data-driven framework for railroad accident analysis based on the CRISP-DM and association rule mining: Empirical evidence from the federal railroad administration (2020–2024)

Zahra Eslami, Rouzbeh Ghousi, Hossein Ghanbari
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

A data-driven framework for railroad accident analysis based on the CRISP-DM and association rule mining: Empirical evidence from the federal railroad administration (2020–2024)

Zahra Eslami, Rouzbeh Ghousi, Hossein Ghanbari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• 12,123 U.S. rail accidents (2020–2024) analyzed via CRISP-DM and Apriori ARM. • 705 rules with Lift > 1 grouped into Derailments, Crossings, and Other Impacts. • Derailments (51.9%) are mainly attributed to switch failure and human error. • Severe risks linked to hot, clear weather with or without active signalization. • High-risk months: June, September; critical states: Florida, Missouri, and California. The railway industry is a critical component of global transportation, yet it faces persistent safety challenges resulting in significant human and financial costs. While previous studies have investigated individual accident factors, the complex interactions among human, environmental, and organizational elements remain underexplored. To address this gap, the present study adopts a comprehensive, data-driven approach using the Cross-Industries Standard Processing for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology to analyze 12,123 accident records from the United States Federal Railroad Administration (U.S. FRA) between 2020 and 2024. Descriptive trend analysis identified 2022 as the year with the highest human casualties and 2023 with the greatest financial losses. The Apriori algorithm was employed to extract 912 valid association rules. A Pareto-based prioritization yielded 705 high-lift and high-confidence rules, which were further refined through semantic pruning and validated via a 10-fold subsampling test. The rules were categorized into three main accident types: Derailments, Highway-Rail Crossings, and Other Impacts. Key findings reveal strong associations between severe accidents and conditions such as high temperatures, low visibility, and lack of signalization—particularly at highway-rail crossings. Some rule combinations demonstrated Lift values exceeding 3.2 and Confidence scores of 1.0, underscoring consistent, high-risk patterns. Spatiotemporal heatmaps further identified critical hotspots in Florida, Missouri, and California, with elevated accident rates in June and September. Visual analyses through scatter plots, heatmaps, and treemaps supported the extraction of interpretable, actionable insights. The study emphasizes the need for integrated, multi-factor safety interventions and provides a foundation for data-driven policymaking aimed at reducing railway accidents and improving systemic resilience in transportation networks . The Data-Driven Framework for Railway Accident Analysis

Results in EngineeringVol. 27
Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.