The Legality And Legal Force of Girik As Collateral In Credit Provision By Rural Banks

This study aims to analyze the validity of using Girik documents as collateral in credit provision by Rural Credit Banks (BPR) based on the perspective of property security law and OJK regulations. Although Girik is administratively recognized in BPR practice based on POJK No. 1 of 2024, legally this document does not meet the requirements as an object of a security interest under Law No. 4 of 1996. Girik is merely proof of payment of land taxes and not proof of ownership rights over land, thus it cannot grant executory rights to creditors in the event of default. This study employs a normative legal approach that examines relevant laws and regulations and legal doctrines. The findings indicate the need for regulatory harmonization and strengthening of land rights conversion mechanisms to recognize documents like Girik as formal collateral. This study provides legal and policy recommendations for BPRs and regulators in establishing an inclusive credit system that ensures legal certainty and protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v6i4.996
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Legality And Legal Force of Girik As Collateral In Credit Provision By Rural Banks

Jonatan Aditya Garingging
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

The Legality And Legal Force of Girik As Collateral In Credit Provision By Rural Banks

Jonatan Aditya Garingging
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity of using Girik documents as collateral in credit provision by Rural Credit Banks (BPR) based on the perspective of property security law and OJK regulations. Although Girik is administratively recognized in BPR practice based on POJK No. 1 of 2024, legally this document does not meet the requirements as an object of a security interest under Law No. 4 of 1996. Girik is merely proof of payment of land taxes and not proof of ownership rights over land, thus it cannot grant executory rights to creditors in the event of default. This study employs a normative legal approach that examines relevant laws and regulations and legal doctrines. The findings indicate the need for regulatory harmonization and strengthening of land rights conversion mechanisms to recognize documents like Girik as formal collateral. This study provides legal and policy recommendations for BPRs and regulators in establishing an inclusive credit system that ensures legal certainty and protection.

International Journal of Educational Research & Social SciencesVol. 6(4)
Parahyangan Catholic University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Legality And Legal Force of Girik As Collateral In Credit Provision By Rural Banks — Jonatan Aditya Garingging · International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS