Tracking progress and interlinkages in SDG achievement: A monitoring index approach with insights from Jordan

Established by the United Nations in 2015, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) consist of 17 interrelated objectives intended to address global economic, social, and environmental challenges in an integrated manner. This study proposes a national SDG monitoring index for Jordan, constructed using a comprehensive set of performance indicators. To capture interlinkages among the goals, correlation analysis is first undertaken, followed by the application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to consolidate the indicators into aggregated goal-level indices. Subsequently, annual growth trends are analyzed to assess the extent to which the SDGs are likely to be achieved by 2030. The empirical results reveal pronounced synergies between SDG 6 and SDG 9 while SDG 5 is associated with the most significant trade-offs. The remaining goals demonstrate varying degrees of synergy and conflict, predominantly falling within the low to moderate range. At the dimensional level, the environmental goals exhibit the highest degree of internal coherence, whereas the means of implementation dimension is characterized by the greatest trade-offs. Although improvements were observed in 14 of the 17 goals and across all four dimensions during the 2005 to 2022 period. Trend analyses suggests that the full realization of any of the goals by 2030 remains unlikely. These findings underscore the necessity of accounting for interdependencies and minimizing multicollinearity in the development of composite indices. In light of these insights, it is recommended that Jordan’s policy agenda and resource allocation strategies place greater emphasis on reversing stagnation and decline in the underperforming goals to accelerate progress toward the 2030 Agenda. • A PCA-based SDG monitoring index effectively captures interlinkages, addressing multicollinearity in indicator aggregation. • A national SDG monitoring index for Jordan using interlinkage assessment and PCA shows synergies in SDGs 6 and 9, tradeoffs in SDG 5. • While 14 out of 17 SDGs and all dimensions improved between 2005–2022, none are on track for full achievement by 2030, requiring urgent policy acceleration. • The SDGs are highly ambitious, and full achievement by 2030 remains challenging, especially for developing countries facing socio-economic and political constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100882
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking progress and interlinkages in SDG achievement: A monitoring index approach with insights from Jordan

Abdullah Ekinci, Ma’in Abed Alhakim Naser Ghanem, Israf Javed
2 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.01
article

Tracking progress and interlinkages in SDG achievement: A monitoring index approach with insights from Jordan

Abdullah Ekinci, Ma’in Abed Alhakim Naser Ghanem, Israf Javed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Established by the United Nations in 2015, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) consist of 17 interrelated objectives intended to address global economic, social, and environmental challenges in an integrated manner. This study proposes a national SDG monitoring index for Jordan, constructed using a comprehensive set of performance indicators. To capture interlinkages among the goals, correlation analysis is first undertaken, followed by the application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to consolidate the indicators into aggregated goal-level indices. Subsequently, annual growth trends are analyzed to assess the extent to which the SDGs are likely to be achieved by 2030. The empirical results reveal pronounced synergies between SDG 6 and SDG 9 while SDG 5 is associated with the most significant trade-offs. The remaining goals demonstrate varying degrees of synergy and conflict, predominantly falling within the low to moderate range. At the dimensional level, the environmental goals exhibit the highest degree of internal coherence, whereas the means of implementation dimension is characterized by the greatest trade-offs. Although improvements were observed in 14 of the 17 goals and across all four dimensions during the 2005 to 2022 period. Trend analyses suggests that the full realization of any of the goals by 2030 remains unlikely. These findings underscore the necessity of accounting for interdependencies and minimizing multicollinearity in the development of composite indices. In light of these insights, it is recommended that Jordan’s policy agenda and resource allocation strategies place greater emphasis on reversing stagnation and decline in the underperforming goals to accelerate progress toward the 2030 Agenda. • A PCA-based SDG monitoring index effectively captures interlinkages, addressing multicollinearity in indicator aggregation. • A national SDG monitoring index for Jordan using interlinkage assessment and PCA shows synergies in SDGs 6 and 9, tradeoffs in SDG 5. • While 14 out of 17 SDGs and all dimensions improved between 2005–2022, none are on track for full achievement by 2030, requiring urgent policy acceleration. • The SDGs are highly ambitious, and full achievement by 2030 remains challenging, especially for developing countries facing socio-economic and political constraints.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 28
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.