A comparative analysis of parametric survival models and machine learning methods in breast cancer prognosis

Accurate prediction of breast cancer survival is critical for optimizing treatment strategies and improving clinical outcomes. This study evaluated a combination of parametric statistical models and machine learning algorithms to identify the most influential prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients. Two commonly used parametric models, log-gaussian regression and logistic regression, were applied to assess the relationship between survival and a set of clinical variables, including age at diagnosis, tumor grade, primary tumor site, marital status, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, race, and receipt of radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Machine learning methods, such as neural networks, support vector machines (SVMs), random forests, gradient boosting machines (GBMs), and logistic regression classifiers, were employed to compare the predictive performance. Among these, the neural network model exhibited the highest predictive accuracy. The random forest model achieved the best balance between model fit and complexity, as indicated by its lowest akaike information criterion and bayesian information criterion values. Across all models, five variables consistently emerged as significant predictors of survival: age, tumor grade, ajcc stage, marital status, and radiation therapy use. These findings highlight the importance of combining traditional survival analysis techniques with machine learning approaches to enhance predictive accuracy and support evidence-based personalized treatment planning in breast cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15696-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of parametric survival models and machine learning methods in breast cancer prognosis

B Venkataramana, Sonia Kaindal
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
4.08
article

A comparative analysis of parametric survival models and machine learning methods in breast cancer prognosis

B Venkataramana, Sonia Kaindal
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate prediction of breast cancer survival is critical for optimizing treatment strategies and improving clinical outcomes. This study evaluated a combination of parametric statistical models and machine learning algorithms to identify the most influential prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients. Two commonly used parametric models, log-gaussian regression and logistic regression, were applied to assess the relationship between survival and a set of clinical variables, including age at diagnosis, tumor grade, primary tumor site, marital status, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, race, and receipt of radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Machine learning methods, such as neural networks, support vector machines (SVMs), random forests, gradient boosting machines (GBMs), and logistic regression classifiers, were employed to compare the predictive performance. Among these, the neural network model exhibited the highest predictive accuracy. The random forest model achieved the best balance between model fit and complexity, as indicated by its lowest akaike information criterion and bayesian information criterion values. Across all models, five variables consistently emerged as significant predictors of survival: age, tumor grade, ajcc stage, marital status, and radiation therapy use. These findings highlight the importance of combining traditional survival analysis techniques with machine learning approaches to enhance predictive accuracy and support evidence-based personalized treatment planning in breast cancer care.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
University Grants Commission, VIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.