Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Oil Recovery Factor Using XGBoost: Insights from Classification and Data-Driven Analyses

In petroleum engineering, it is essential to determine the ultimate recovery factor (RF) particularly before exploitation and exploration. However, accurately estimating requires data that may not be necessarily available or measured at early stages of reservoir development. To rectify this, we applied machine learning (ML) to estimate oil RF from readily available features. To construct the ML models, we applied the XGBoost classification algorithm. Classification was chosen over regression because recovery factor is bounded from 0 to 1, much like probability. Three databases with various reservoir properties and recovery factors were used, leaving us with four different combinations to first train and test the ML models and then further evaluate them using an independent database including unseen data. Cross-validation with ten folds was applied on the training datasets to assess the effectiveness of the models. To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the models, the accuracy, within-1 accuracy, precision, recall, macro-averaged f1 score and R2 were determined. Overall, results showed that the XGBoost classification algorithm could estimate the RF class with accuracies as high as 0.77 in the training datasets, 0.36 in the testing datasets and 0.24 in the independent databases used. We found that the reliability of the XGBoost classification model depended on the data in the training dataset, indicating that the ML models were database dependent. The feature importance analysis and the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach showed that the most important features were reserves, reservoir area and thickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
InterPore journal.
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69631/ipj.v2i3nr53
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Oil Recovery Factor Using XGBoost: Insights from Classification and Data-Driven Analyses

Mohammad B. Shadmand, Vahid Taslimitehrani, Behzad Ghanbarian, Alireza Roustazadeh et al.
InterPore journal.
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Oil Recovery Factor Using XGBoost: Insights from Classification and Data-Driven Analyses

Mohammad B. Shadmand, Vahid Taslimitehrani, Behzad Ghanbarian, Alireza Roustazadeh, Frank Male, Larry W. Lake
article en

Abstract

In petroleum engineering, it is essential to determine the ultimate recovery factor (RF) particularly before exploitation and exploration. However, accurately estimating requires data that may not be necessarily available or measured at early stages of reservoir development. To rectify this, we applied machine learning (ML) to estimate oil RF from readily available features. To construct the ML models, we applied the XGBoost classification algorithm. Classification was chosen over regression because recovery factor is bounded from 0 to 1, much like probability. Three databases with various reservoir properties and recovery factors were used, leaving us with four different combinations to first train and test the ML models and then further evaluate them using an independent database including unseen data. Cross-validation with ten folds was applied on the training datasets to assess the effectiveness of the models. To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the models, the accuracy, within-1 accuracy, precision, recall, macro-averaged f1 score and R2 were determined. Overall, results showed that the XGBoost classification algorithm could estimate the RF class with accuracies as high as 0.77 in the training datasets, 0.36 in the testing datasets and 0.24 in the independent databases used. We found that the reliability of the XGBoost classification model depended on the data in the training dataset, indicating that the ML models were database dependent. The feature importance analysis and the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach showed that the most important features were reserves, reservoir area and thickness.

InterPore journal.Vol. 2(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Kansas State University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Machine Science (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
University of Texas at Arlington
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.