Why Encampment Bans Don’t Reduce Homelessness

The issue of homelessness remains widespread all across America. To combat the issue, cities have passed policies that place restrictions or bans on homeless encampments in public spaces, and this right to do so has been reinforced by the Supreme Court’s passing of City of Grants Pass v. Johnson. To determine whether bans on homeless encampments in public spaces are effective in addressing the issue of homelessness, I use data from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau to perform a difference-in-differences analysis to compare counties – Sacramento County, Manchester CoC, and Miami-Dade – with policies passed to neighboring counties without policies passed. Our results indicate that encampment-banning policies did not lead to a statistically significant reduction in the unsheltered homeless population for any of the counties analyzed. However, our results revealed that fewer barriers to policy implementation correspond to more statistically significant change, and non-monetary penalties are associated with reductions in homelessness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Student Research
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i4.8330
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Encampment Bans Don’t Reduce Homelessness

Hayden Fu
Journal of Student Research
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

Why Encampment Bans Don’t Reduce Homelessness

Hayden Fu
article en

Abstract

The issue of homelessness remains widespread all across America. To combat the issue, cities have passed policies that place restrictions or bans on homeless encampments in public spaces, and this right to do so has been reinforced by the Supreme Court’s passing of City of Grants Pass v. Johnson. To determine whether bans on homeless encampments in public spaces are effective in addressing the issue of homelessness, I use data from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau to perform a difference-in-differences analysis to compare counties – Sacramento County, Manchester CoC, and Miami-Dade – with policies passed to neighboring counties without policies passed. Our results indicate that encampment-banning policies did not lead to a statistically significant reduction in the unsheltered homeless population for any of the counties analyzed. However, our results revealed that fewer barriers to policy implementation correspond to more statistically significant change, and non-monetary penalties are associated with reductions in homelessness.

Journal of Student ResearchVol. 13(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.