Fairness Matters: Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Skin Cancer Classification

Almost 1 in 5 Americans develop skin cancer by the age of 70, and it is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, with most cases being preventable. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential to accelerate the diagnosis of skin cancer for early treatment. However, the fairness of using AI for skin cancer detection has raised concerns due to the lower accuracy of "darker" skin tone detection. This paper conducts a comprehensive study on the bias problem using the fitzpatrick dataset, while analyzing the effects of different methods towards mitigating this bias. Throughout our experiments, we found that not only was the darkest skin type biased, one of the specific light skin types also had a relatively low accuracy. Five AI models were evaluated and compared in terms of bias, and four augmentation techniques were applied to mitigate bias. Moreover, we studied the impact of training parameters (e.g. batch size, data splitting) on bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Student Research
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7017
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness Matters: Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Skin Cancer Classification

Amy Zhang, Ana Zhao, Andrew Han
Journal of Student Research
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Fairness Matters: Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Skin Cancer Classification

Amy Zhang, Ana Zhao, Andrew Han
article en

Abstract

Almost 1 in 5 Americans develop skin cancer by the age of 70, and it is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, with most cases being preventable. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential to accelerate the diagnosis of skin cancer for early treatment. However, the fairness of using AI for skin cancer detection has raised concerns due to the lower accuracy of "darker" skin tone detection. This paper conducts a comprehensive study on the bias problem using the fitzpatrick dataset, while analyzing the effects of different methods towards mitigating this bias. Throughout our experiments, we found that not only was the darkest skin type biased, one of the specific light skin types also had a relatively low accuracy. Five AI models were evaluated and compared in terms of bias, and four augmentation techniques were applied to mitigate bias. Moreover, we studied the impact of training parameters (e.g. batch size, data splitting) on bias.

Journal of Student ResearchVol. 13(3)
Westlake Health Center (US), Las Vegas Academy of the Arts (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fairness Matters: Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Skin Cancer Classification — Amy Zhang, Ana Zhao, et al. · Journal of Student Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS