Impact of donor-recipient ethnic matching on survival after lung transplantation in Italy

Disparities in access to and outcomes of lung transplantation have been extensively studied in North America, but little is known about these disparities in Europe. This study evaluates the impact of ethnicity on lung transplantation outcomes in Italy, including the role of ethnic mismatch between donor and recipient. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung transplantation between 2010 and 2020 in six Italian transplant centers. Demographic, clinical, and survival data were analyzed. The primary endpoint was survival following bilateral lung transplantation in Caucasian and non-Caucasian patients. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival. Of the 959 patients studied, 93.4% were Caucasian and 6.6% non-Caucasian. Significant differences in access to transplantation were observed by ethnicity (p = 0.002). Non-Caucasian patients showed a trend toward lower unadjusted survival (p = 0.069), with significant differences linked to donor-recipient racial mismatch (p = 0.002). Cox regression identified recipient age, restrictive lung disease, education level, and donor-recipient mismatch as independent predictors of survival. Our study highlights disparities in lung transplantation outcomes linked to ethnicity and education level in Italy. Strategies to improve access and address donorrecipient mismatches could enhance equity in transplant care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Updates in Surgery
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02371-2
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of donor-recipient ethnic matching on survival after lung transplantation in Italy

Daniele Diso, Massimo Boffini, Marco Schiavon, Matteo Petroncini et al.
Updates in Surgery
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Impact of donor-recipient ethnic matching on survival after lung transplantation in Italy

Daniele Diso, Massimo Boffini, Marco Schiavon, Matteo Petroncini, A. Palleschi, Luca Luzzi, Chiara Catelli, Mario Nosotti, Filippo Antonacci, Lorenzo Rosso, Federico Venuta, Matteo Marro, Federico Rea, Paola Besani
article en

Abstract

Disparities in access to and outcomes of lung transplantation have been extensively studied in North America, but little is known about these disparities in Europe. This study evaluates the impact of ethnicity on lung transplantation outcomes in Italy, including the role of ethnic mismatch between donor and recipient. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung transplantation between 2010 and 2020 in six Italian transplant centers. Demographic, clinical, and survival data were analyzed. The primary endpoint was survival following bilateral lung transplantation in Caucasian and non-Caucasian patients. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival. Of the 959 patients studied, 93.4% were Caucasian and 6.6% non-Caucasian. Significant differences in access to transplantation were observed by ethnicity (p = 0.002). Non-Caucasian patients showed a trend toward lower unadjusted survival (p = 0.069), with significant differences linked to donor-recipient racial mismatch (p = 0.002). Cox regression identified recipient age, restrictive lung disease, education level, and donor-recipient mismatch as independent predictors of survival. Our study highlights disparities in lung transplantation outcomes linked to ethnicity and education level in Italy. Strategies to improve access and address donorrecipient mismatches could enhance equity in transplant care.

Updates in Surgery
University of Siena (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of Turin (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.