Handwritten Identification Using K Nearest Neighbor and Compared with Feature Extraction Precision Naive Bayes Algorithm

The primary goal of the research is to examine handwriting identification using the k closest neighbor (KNN) algorithm and evaluate how accurate it is by contrasting its feature precision with that of the Naive Bayes (NB) approach. The Naive Bayes (NB) algorithm (N=10) and the k nearest neighbor (N=10) with a g-power value of 80% were used in the proposed work to identify handwriting. Datasets with thresholds of 0.05 %, confidence intervals of 95 % mean and standard deviation, and recent study findings were gathered from various web sources. was run through twenty times to gather data. The handwritten character had the highest level of precision. When compared to the k nearest neighbor algorithm, the identification using Naive Bayes is (97.45%), with minimum mean error of 97.3%, and the significance value is 0.03 (p < 0.05 Independent sample T-test). For handwriting identification, the Naive Bayes algorithm performed more accurately and classified the digits more well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120008
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handwritten Identification Using K Nearest Neighbor and Compared with Feature Extraction Precision Naive Bayes Algorithm

Vineet Padmanabhan, A Ashwini, P. Ravikiran, K. Sashirekha
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
article

Handwritten Identification Using K Nearest Neighbor and Compared with Feature Extraction Precision Naive Bayes Algorithm

Vineet Padmanabhan, A Ashwini, P. Ravikiran, K. Sashirekha
article en

Abstract

The primary goal of the research is to examine handwriting identification using the k closest neighbor (KNN) algorithm and evaluate how accurate it is by contrasting its feature precision with that of the Naive Bayes (NB) approach. The Naive Bayes (NB) algorithm (N=10) and the k nearest neighbor (N=10) with a g-power value of 80% were used in the proposed work to identify handwriting. Datasets with thresholds of 0.05 %, confidence intervals of 95 % mean and standard deviation, and recent study findings were gathered from various web sources. was run through twenty times to gather data. The handwritten character had the highest level of precision. When compared to the k nearest neighbor algorithm, the identification using Naive Bayes is (97.45%), with minimum mean error of 97.3%, and the significance value is 0.03 (p < 0.05 Independent sample T-test). For handwriting identification, the Naive Bayes algorithm performed more accurately and classified the digits more well.

BlueCrest University College (GH), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Handwritten Identification Using K Nearest Neighbor and Compared with Feature Extraction Precision Naive Bayes Algorithm — Vineet Padmanabhan, A Ashwini, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS