Polypropylene vs. XLPE Cables: Observed Differences Related to Cable Accessories

Polypropylene (PP) cables are considered as a promising alternative to cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) cables in high-voltage applications due to their recyclability and reduced carbon footprint. However, the transition from XLPE to PP introduces notable differences in the cable accessory design, installation, and performance. This paper presents differences observed during several of our R&D projects related to AC and DC cable accessories for XLPE and PP cables, along with additional differences reported in existing literature. Specific aspects discussed include variations in surface treatment and grinding processes, challenges in accessory design, insulation recovery in factory joints, and performance discrepancies under low-temperature conditions. By identifying these differences, this study provides valuable insights into the adaptation of existing accessory technologies for PP cables and highlights potential areas for further optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icempe66159.2025.11122946
Primary Topic
Transport Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polypropylene vs. XLPE Cables: Observed Differences Related to Cable Accessories

Yi Luo, Mingyu Zhou, Maggie Haitian Wang, Wenpeng Li et al.
Transport Systems and Technology
article

Polypropylene vs. XLPE Cables: Observed Differences Related to Cable Accessories

Yi Luo, Mingyu Zhou, Maggie Haitian Wang, Wenpeng Li, Ruoyu Xu, Xuyang Zhao
article en

Abstract

Polypropylene (PP) cables are considered as a promising alternative to cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) cables in high-voltage applications due to their recyclability and reduced carbon footprint. However, the transition from XLPE to PP introduces notable differences in the cable accessory design, installation, and performance. This paper presents differences observed during several of our R&D projects related to AC and DC cable accessories for XLPE and PP cables, along with additional differences reported in existing literature. Specific aspects discussed include variations in surface treatment and grinding processes, challenges in accessory design, insulation recovery in factory joints, and performance discrepancies under low-temperature conditions. By identifying these differences, this study provides valuable insights into the adaptation of existing accessory technologies for PP cables and highlights potential areas for further optimization.

Electric Power Research Institute (US), North China Electric Power University (CN), Zhejiang Institute of Special Equipment Inspection (CN), China Huadian Corporation (China) (CN)
State Grid Corporation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Transport Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Polypropylene vs. XLPE Cables: Observed Differences Related to Cable Accessories — Yi Luo, Mingyu Zhou, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS