Comparative Analysis on Diet Prediction of Diabetes Person Using Recurrent Neural Network Over Decision Tree with Improved Accuracy

The examination studies how efficient Recurrent Neural Networks and Decision Trees might improve diabetic meal recommendations. There are two groups in charge of implementation. The initial is a decision tree, and the second is an RNN. This execution used 1000 samples with 2000 samples. The G Power statistical tool generates samples with an 80 % probability. Present decision tree models are 66.31 % accurate, whereas recommended recurrent neural networks are <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 4. 4 3 \%}$</tex>. Recurrent neural networks outperform Bayes models. The significance level is 003. (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p_{i} 0.05$</tex>). The accuracy has improved and is now much greater than that of the decision tree.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120078
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis on Diet Prediction of Diabetes Person Using Recurrent Neural Network Over Decision Tree with Improved Accuracy

Menwa Alshammeri, J. Joselin Jeya Sheela, Chirumamilla Srikanth
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Comparative Analysis on Diet Prediction of Diabetes Person Using Recurrent Neural Network Over Decision Tree with Improved Accuracy

Menwa Alshammeri, J. Joselin Jeya Sheela, Chirumamilla Srikanth
article en

Abstract

The examination studies how efficient Recurrent Neural Networks and Decision Trees might improve diabetic meal recommendations. There are two groups in charge of implementation. The initial is a decision tree, and the second is an RNN. This execution used 1000 samples with 2000 samples. The G Power statistical tool generates samples with an 80 % probability. Present decision tree models are 66.31 % accurate, whereas recommended recurrent neural networks are <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 4. 4 3 \%}$</tex>. Recurrent neural networks outperform Bayes models. The significance level is 003. (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p_{i} 0.05$</tex>). The accuracy has improved and is now much greater than that of the decision tree.

Jouf University (SA), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.