Comparative Analysis of FPA-LS-SVM Model in Comparison with FPA-ELM, LS-SVM and ELM Model in Earthquake Prediction

This study presents a novel comparative analysis of several advanced machine learning algorithms for earthquake prediction. The focus is on the Flower Pollination Algorithm combined with FPA-LS-SVM and its performance in comparison with other models, including the Flower Pollination Algorithm combined with Extreme Learning Machine (FPA-ELM), Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM). The aim is to evaluate which algorithm provides the best accuracy for predicting seismic events. The research involves implementing and evaluating these models to assess their predictive accuracy. Sample size calculations were conducted using G Power software, determining a sample size of 10 per group, with a pretest power of 80%, a significance threshold of 0.05%, and a confidence interval of 95%. The G Power values ranged between 0.59 and 0.9. The findings demonstrate that the FPA-LS-SVM model achieves an accuracy of 95.48%, surpassing the FPA-ELM, LS-SVM, and ELM models, which have accuracies of 93.18%. Statistical analysis reveals a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the FPA-LS-SVM model and the other models, with a significance value of 0.019. These results indicate that the FPA-LS-SVM model performs better in terms of accuracy compared to the FPA-ELM, LS-SVM, and ELM models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119927
Primary Topic
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of FPA-LS-SVM Model in Comparison with FPA-ELM, LS-SVM and ELM Model in Earthquake Prediction

S. Sobitha Ahila, A. Franklin Alex Joseph, Anand Anbalagan, A. Surya
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
article

Comparative Analysis of FPA-LS-SVM Model in Comparison with FPA-ELM, LS-SVM and ELM Model in Earthquake Prediction

S. Sobitha Ahila, A. Franklin Alex Joseph, Anand Anbalagan, A. Surya
article en

Abstract

This study presents a novel comparative analysis of several advanced machine learning algorithms for earthquake prediction. The focus is on the Flower Pollination Algorithm combined with FPA-LS-SVM and its performance in comparison with other models, including the Flower Pollination Algorithm combined with Extreme Learning Machine (FPA-ELM), Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM). The aim is to evaluate which algorithm provides the best accuracy for predicting seismic events. The research involves implementing and evaluating these models to assess their predictive accuracy. Sample size calculations were conducted using G Power software, determining a sample size of 10 per group, with a pretest power of 80%, a significance threshold of 0.05%, and a confidence interval of 95%. The G Power values ranged between 0.59 and 0.9. The findings demonstrate that the FPA-LS-SVM model achieves an accuracy of 95.48%, surpassing the FPA-ELM, LS-SVM, and ELM models, which have accuracies of 93.18%. Statistical analysis reveals a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the FPA-LS-SVM model and the other models, with a significance value of 0.019. These results indicate that the FPA-LS-SVM model performs better in terms of accuracy compared to the FPA-ELM, LS-SVM, and ELM models.

Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET), Saveetha University (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of FPA-LS-SVM Model in Comparison with FPA-ELM, LS-SVM and ELM Model in Earthquake Prediction — S. Sobitha Ahila, A. Franklin Alex Joseph, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS