Comparative Study of the Effects of Generating the Network Datasets Using Multiple Geographical Information System Softwares

Software that is integrated into the Geographic Information System (GIS) has a major impact on processing and routing of spatial data. To maximize the use of GIS tools in a wide range of applications, one must have a thorough understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each tool. Through a comparison and contrast of two well-known geographic information system (GIS) software, namely ArcGIS and QGIS, the study aims to assess the results of building network datasets for the purpose of routing analysis. The creation of a network dataset and the digitalization of Ambo town using Landsat 8 imagery are the main objectives of the research. It is found that ArcGIS offers a feature-rich and intuitive UI along with strong integration possibilities. Its mild learning curve and expensive price, however, can make it less accessible to novice users. As an open-source substitute, QGIS, on the other hand, has a robust community and a plugin-based design that facilitates customization and interaction with several data sources, proving to be both flexible and affordable. The results clearly indicate that ArcGIS has a greater number of features than QGIS; however, QGIS is a more cost-effective and practical alternative that is backed by a robust community. The optimal choice will be determined by the user's requirements, the resources at their disposal, and their level of expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119796
Primary Topic
Energy and Environmental Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of the Effects of Generating the Network Datasets Using Multiple Geographical Information System Softwares

Anand Raju, Vidhya Lakshmi Sivakumar
Energy and Environmental Systems
article

Comparative Study of the Effects of Generating the Network Datasets Using Multiple Geographical Information System Softwares

Anand Raju, Vidhya Lakshmi Sivakumar
article en

Abstract

Software that is integrated into the Geographic Information System (GIS) has a major impact on processing and routing of spatial data. To maximize the use of GIS tools in a wide range of applications, one must have a thorough understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each tool. Through a comparison and contrast of two well-known geographic information system (GIS) software, namely ArcGIS and QGIS, the study aims to assess the results of building network datasets for the purpose of routing analysis. The creation of a network dataset and the digitalization of Ambo town using Landsat 8 imagery are the main objectives of the research. It is found that ArcGIS offers a feature-rich and intuitive UI along with strong integration possibilities. Its mild learning curve and expensive price, however, can make it less accessible to novice users. As an open-source substitute, QGIS, on the other hand, has a robust community and a plugin-based design that facilitates customization and interaction with several data sources, proving to be both flexible and affordable. The results clearly indicate that ArcGIS has a greater number of features than QGIS; however, QGIS is a more cost-effective and practical alternative that is backed by a robust community. The optimal choice will be determined by the user's requirements, the resources at their disposal, and their level of expertise.

Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Energy and Environmental Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.