Microarray Data Classification Accuracy Enhancement Using Support Vector Macine in Comparison with K-Nearest Neighbour

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning approaches for classifying microarray data by comparing the SVM and KNN algorithms. This work involved using genetic microarray data and analyzing the classification performance of SVM and KNN classifiers. For the analysis, G-power calculations were set with an 80 % power level, a 95 % confidence interval, and alpha and beta values of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, with a total sample size of 20. The results showed that the KNN algorithm achieved an accuracy of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 6. 6 6 \%}$</tex> and a loss rate of 3.33%, outperforming the Support Vector Machine, which had an accuracy of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 1. 3 1 \%}$</tex> and a loss rate of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{8. 6 8 \%}$</tex>. Despite these differences, the statistical analysis using an independent sample <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$t$</tex>-test indicated that the performance differences between SVM and KNN were not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.10 at a 95% confidence level. Overall, the KNN algorithm demonstrated a notably higher classification accuracy compared to the Support Vector Machine, making it a more effective choice for microarray data classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119897
Primary Topic
Face and Expression Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microarray Data Classification Accuracy Enhancement Using Support Vector Macine in Comparison with K-Nearest Neighbour

Malathi Kanagasabai, K. Karthik, Vidhya Prakash Rajendran, Pranath Reddy
Face and Expression Recognition
article

Microarray Data Classification Accuracy Enhancement Using Support Vector Macine in Comparison with K-Nearest Neighbour

Malathi Kanagasabai, K. Karthik, Vidhya Prakash Rajendran, Pranath Reddy
article en

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning approaches for classifying microarray data by comparing the SVM and KNN algorithms. This work involved using genetic microarray data and analyzing the classification performance of SVM and KNN classifiers. For the analysis, G-power calculations were set with an 80 % power level, a 95 % confidence interval, and alpha and beta values of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, with a total sample size of 20. The results showed that the KNN algorithm achieved an accuracy of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 6. 6 6 \%}$</tex> and a loss rate of 3.33%, outperforming the Support Vector Machine, which had an accuracy of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 1. 3 1 \%}$</tex> and a loss rate of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{8. 6 8 \%}$</tex>. Despite these differences, the statistical analysis using an independent sample <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$t$</tex>-test indicated that the performance differences between SVM and KNN were not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.10 at a 95% confidence level. Overall, the KNN algorithm demonstrated a notably higher classification accuracy compared to the Support Vector Machine, making it a more effective choice for microarray data classification.

German University of Technology (OM), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Face and Expression Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.