Moving Object Detection Using Eigen Background In Comparison with Gaussian Mixture Model to measure F-Score

The main objective of this work is to compare the accuracy and F-Score of the Eigen backdrop's motion object detection to that of the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and assess how poorly it performs in these areas. The CDNet dataset, which consists of video clips, provided samples. Clincalc is used to calculate samples by setting parameters such alpha (0.3), minimum pretest power (80%), and error rate (0.05). The accuracy and F-score of the Eigen Background subtraction algorithm in detecting moving objects are compared with that of the Gaussian Mixture Model.In comparison to the Gaussian Mixture Model's accuracy (83.84<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>) and F-score (79.16), Eigen background exhibits higher accuracy (86.8<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>) and F-score (80.91). When comparing photos with different levels of brightness, the accuracy of the brighter images is better. The Eigen background Subtraction's accuracy and F-score are found to be much greater than those of the Gaussian Mixture Model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120066
Primary Topic
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving Object Detection Using Eigen Background In Comparison with Gaussian Mixture Model to measure F-Score

Kirupa Ganapathy, M. Monika, Muhammad Fahad Zia
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
article

Moving Object Detection Using Eigen Background In Comparison with Gaussian Mixture Model to measure F-Score

Kirupa Ganapathy, M. Monika, Muhammad Fahad Zia
article en

Abstract

The main objective of this work is to compare the accuracy and F-Score of the Eigen backdrop's motion object detection to that of the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and assess how poorly it performs in these areas. The CDNet dataset, which consists of video clips, provided samples. Clincalc is used to calculate samples by setting parameters such alpha (0.3), minimum pretest power (80%), and error rate (0.05). The accuracy and F-score of the Eigen Background subtraction algorithm in detecting moving objects are compared with that of the Gaussian Mixture Model.In comparison to the Gaussian Mixture Model's accuracy (83.84<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>) and F-score (79.16), Eigen background exhibits higher accuracy (86.8<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>) and F-score (80.91). When comparing photos with different levels of brightness, the accuracy of the brighter images is better. The Eigen background Subtraction's accuracy and F-score are found to be much greater than those of the Gaussian Mixture Model.

BPP University (GB), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.