Comparative Analysis of Titanic Data Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Enhanced Accuracy

In the context of evaluating machine learning algorithms for binary classification tasks, predicting passenger survival on the Titanic provides a practical benchmark. The research aims to determine which machine learning algorithm is better at predicting passenger survival on the Titanic. Both algorithms were tested on the same dataset, with sample sizes determined using G-power software. The sample size was set at 10 per group, with a pretest power of 80%, a threshold of 0.05%, and a confidence interval of 95%. The results showed that Logistic Regression outperformed Support Vector Machine in predicting survival rates. Specifically, Logistic Regression achieved an accuracy of 92.80%, whereas Support Vector Machine reached 86.25%. The disparity in output between the two methods was statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.003 (which is less than 0.05).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119881
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Titanic Data Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Enhanced Accuracy

J. Mohana, N. Karthik, L. Sreenivasulu
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Comparative Analysis of Titanic Data Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Enhanced Accuracy

J. Mohana, N. Karthik, L. Sreenivasulu
article en

Abstract

In the context of evaluating machine learning algorithms for binary classification tasks, predicting passenger survival on the Titanic provides a practical benchmark. The research aims to determine which machine learning algorithm is better at predicting passenger survival on the Titanic. Both algorithms were tested on the same dataset, with sample sizes determined using G-power software. The sample size was set at 10 per group, with a pretest power of 80%, a threshold of 0.05%, and a confidence interval of 95%. The results showed that Logistic Regression outperformed Support Vector Machine in predicting survival rates. Specifically, Logistic Regression achieved an accuracy of 92.80%, whereas Support Vector Machine reached 86.25%. The disparity in output between the two methods was statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.003 (which is less than 0.05).

Anna University, Chennai (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Titanic Data Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Enhanced Accuracy — J. Mohana, N. Karthik, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS