Reservoir Inclination and Permeability Effects on CO2 Plume Migration - A Numerical Simulation Study

Abstract Reservoir inclination and permeability are two key variables during the injection and later lateral migration of CO2. These two factors will control the lateral extent of the plume, CO2 dissolution, residual trapping and the pressure build up within the reservoir. The goal of this paper is to use reservoir simulation to illustrate the effects of reservoir inclination and permeability on the lateral propagation of CO2 in inclined reservoirs during and after injection. A homogeneous 100 m thick reservoir is modeled in five inclinations (0 °, 0.5 °, 1 °, 2 ° and 4 °) and with two types of reservoirs with porosities and permeabilities of 20%/100md and 25%/400md. Three CO2 injection scenarios were considered, 1, 3 and 5 MMTPA. The numerical simulation of the injection and later lateral migration is performed for 1000 years to assess CO2 saturation, CO2 dissolution, residual trapping and pressure build up within the reservoir. The main effect on CO2 saturation caused by permeability differences is that the 20% porosity 100md reservoir shows a wide invasion zone of CO2 around the injection well, whereas the 25% porosity 400md reservoir shows a narrower CO2 invasion zone and a much faster vertical migration. Complete vertical migration in the better reservoir can take a few years, whereas in the lower permeability reservoir it takes decades. This observation applies to all inclinations. Reservoir quality and inclination also affect CO2 dissolution and residual trapping. Residual trapping is almost double in the lower porosity/permeability reservoir than in the higher porosity/permeability reservoir. The opposite is true for dissolution, since there is more propagation in the higher porosity/permeability reservoir, it is exposed to more formation water, doubling its dissolution compared with the lower porosity/permeability reservoir. Higher reservoir inclinations have more dissolution. Pressure build up is proportional to the amount of CO2 injected and the buildup is greater in the lower porosity/permeability reservoir than in the higher porosity/permeability reservoir. The difference in pressure build up between the two reservoirs in the 1 MMTPA case is 20 psi, 80 psi in the 3 MMTPA case and 100 psi in the 5 MMTPA case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/225818-ms
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reservoir Inclination and Permeability Effects on CO2 Plume Migration - A Numerical Simulation Study

A. Ghamdi, M. Valderrama
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Reservoir Inclination and Permeability Effects on CO2 Plume Migration - A Numerical Simulation Study

A. Ghamdi, M. Valderrama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reservoir inclination and permeability are two key variables during the injection and later lateral migration of CO2. These two factors will control the lateral extent of the plume, CO2 dissolution, residual trapping and the pressure build up within the reservoir. The goal of this paper is to use reservoir simulation to illustrate the effects of reservoir inclination and permeability on the lateral propagation of CO2 in inclined reservoirs during and after injection. A homogeneous 100 m thick reservoir is modeled in five inclinations (0 °, 0.5 °, 1 °, 2 ° and 4 °) and with two types of reservoirs with porosities and permeabilities of 20%/100md and 25%/400md. Three CO2 injection scenarios were considered, 1, 3 and 5 MMTPA. The numerical simulation of the injection and later lateral migration is performed for 1000 years to assess CO2 saturation, CO2 dissolution, residual trapping and pressure build up within the reservoir. The main effect on CO2 saturation caused by permeability differences is that the 20% porosity 100md reservoir shows a wide invasion zone of CO2 around the injection well, whereas the 25% porosity 400md reservoir shows a narrower CO2 invasion zone and a much faster vertical migration. Complete vertical migration in the better reservoir can take a few years, whereas in the lower permeability reservoir it takes decades. This observation applies to all inclinations. Reservoir quality and inclination also affect CO2 dissolution and residual trapping. Residual trapping is almost double in the lower porosity/permeability reservoir than in the higher porosity/permeability reservoir. The opposite is true for dissolution, since there is more propagation in the higher porosity/permeability reservoir, it is exposed to more formation water, doubling its dissolution compared with the lower porosity/permeability reservoir. Higher reservoir inclinations have more dissolution. Pressure build up is proportional to the amount of CO2 injected and the buildup is greater in the lower porosity/permeability reservoir than in the higher porosity/permeability reservoir. The difference in pressure build up between the two reservoirs in the 1 MMTPA case is 20 psi, 80 psi in the 3 MMTPA case and 100 psi in the 5 MMTPA case.

Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reservoir Inclination and Permeability Effects on CO2 Plume Migration - A Numerical Simulation Study — A. Ghamdi, M. Valderrama · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS