MonoPatchNeRF: Improving Neural Radiance Fields with Patch-Based Monocular Guidance

The latest regularized Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) approaches produce poor geometry and view extrapolation for large scale sparse view scenes, such as ETH3D. Density-based approaches tend to be under-constrained, while surface-based approaches tend to miss details. In this paper, we take a density-based approach, sampling patches instead of individual rays to better incorporate monocular depth and normal estimates and patch-based photometric consistency constraints between training views and sampled virtual views. Loosely constraining densities based on estimated depth aligned to sparse points further improves geometric accuracy. While maintaining similar view synthesis quality, our approach significantly improves geometric accuracy on the ETH3D benchmark, e.g. increasing the F1@2cm score by 4x-8x compared to other regularized density-based approaches, with much lower training and inference time than other approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/3dv66043.2025.00049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MonoPatchNeRF: Improving Neural Radiance Fields with Patch-Based Monocular Guidance

Yuqun Wu, Derek Hoiem, Shenlong Wang, Chuhang Zou et al.
1 citations
Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
0.67
article

MonoPatchNeRF: Improving Neural Radiance Fields with Patch-Based Monocular Guidance

Yuqun Wu, Derek Hoiem, Shenlong Wang, Chuhang Zou, Jae Yong Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The latest regularized Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) approaches produce poor geometry and view extrapolation for large scale sparse view scenes, such as ETH3D. Density-based approaches tend to be under-constrained, while surface-based approaches tend to miss details. In this paper, we take a density-based approach, sampling patches instead of individual rays to better incorporate monocular depth and normal estimates and patch-based photometric consistency constraints between training views and sampled virtual views. Loosely constraining densities based on estimated depth aligned to sparse points further improves geometric accuracy. While maintaining similar view synthesis quality, our approach significantly improves geometric accuracy on the ETH3D benchmark, e.g. increasing the F1@2cm score by 4x-8x compared to other regularized density-based approaches, with much lower training and inference time than other approaches.

Amazon (United States) (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MonoPatchNeRF: Improving Neural Radiance Fields with Patch-Based Monocular Guidance — Yuqun Wu, Derek Hoiem, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS