SVM-Based Currency Identification System with Naive Bayes Prediction Accuracy Comparison

To precisely identify the currency's worth using machine learning languages like Support Vector Machine and evaluate the quality of the predictions using Naive Bayes. The Currency Recognition System makes use of machine learning algorithms such as Naive Bayes (n=10) and Support Vector Machine (n=10). Here, a pretest power analysis was performed using a sample size of 20 for each of the two groups and an 80% G-power. Support vector machines with an accuracy of 87.09% and Naive Bayes with an accuracy of 51.61% were used to create the currency recognition system. According to the experiment, the independent samples t-tests and the statistically significant difference of 2-tailed accuracy for both algorithms is <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.001(\mathrm{p}&lt;0.05)$</tex>. In the currency recognition system, SVM outperforms Naive Bayes by a wide margin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120056
Primary Topic
Currency Recognition and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SVM-Based Currency Identification System with Naive Bayes Prediction Accuracy Comparison

G. Ramkumar, Ravi Samikannu, D R, Sai Akhil Kumar Sreeharikota
Currency Recognition and Detection
article

SVM-Based Currency Identification System with Naive Bayes Prediction Accuracy Comparison

G. Ramkumar, Ravi Samikannu, D R, Sai Akhil Kumar Sreeharikota
article en

Abstract

To precisely identify the currency's worth using machine learning languages like Support Vector Machine and evaluate the quality of the predictions using Naive Bayes. The Currency Recognition System makes use of machine learning algorithms such as Naive Bayes (n=10) and Support Vector Machine (n=10). Here, a pretest power analysis was performed using a sample size of 20 for each of the two groups and an 80% G-power. Support vector machines with an accuracy of 87.09% and Naive Bayes with an accuracy of 51.61% were used to create the currency recognition system. According to the experiment, the independent samples t-tests and the statistically significant difference of 2-tailed accuracy for both algorithms is <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.001(\mathrm{p}&lt;0.05)$</tex>. In the currency recognition system, SVM outperforms Naive Bayes by a wide margin.

University of Botswana (BW), Saveetha University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Currency Recognition and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.