Automated Fake News Detection Using Logistic Regression over Decision Tree with Improved Accuracy

This paper's primary goal is to use machine learning techniques, specifically Logistic Regression and Decision Trees, to identify bogus news on social media. An innovative logistic model is employed to attain accuracy. To measure accuracy and loss, datasets from the Kaggle library are used. There are twenty samples in all. Decision trees (N=10) and logistic regression (N=10) were the two categories that were taken into account. Logistic regression yields a 93.68% accuracy and a 6.32% loss, which seems to be better than Decision Tree, which yields an 81.71% accuracy and an 18.39% loss, respectively. In conclusion, it seems that Logistic Regression performs substantially better than Decision Trees. The independent sample T-Test value (p= 0.001, 2 tailed in SPSS analysis) for both the Decision Tree (DT) and Logistic Regression (LR) algorithms shows statistical satisfaction with a confidence level of 95%. Logistic regression appears to be a considerably superior method than decision trees for detecting bogus news.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119924
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Fake News Detection Using Logistic Regression over Decision Tree with Improved Accuracy

V Pavithra, G Anitha, Salim Lahmiri, C. Balaji
1 citations
Spam and Phishing Detection
0.78
article

Automated Fake News Detection Using Logistic Regression over Decision Tree with Improved Accuracy

V Pavithra, G Anitha, Salim Lahmiri, C. Balaji
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper's primary goal is to use machine learning techniques, specifically Logistic Regression and Decision Trees, to identify bogus news on social media. An innovative logistic model is employed to attain accuracy. To measure accuracy and loss, datasets from the Kaggle library are used. There are twenty samples in all. Decision trees (N=10) and logistic regression (N=10) were the two categories that were taken into account. Logistic regression yields a 93.68% accuracy and a 6.32% loss, which seems to be better than Decision Tree, which yields an 81.71% accuracy and an 18.39% loss, respectively. In conclusion, it seems that Logistic Regression performs substantially better than Decision Trees. The independent sample T-Test value (p= 0.001, 2 tailed in SPSS analysis) for both the Decision Tree (DT) and Logistic Regression (LR) algorithms shows statistical satisfaction with a confidence level of 95%. Logistic regression appears to be a considerably superior method than decision trees for detecting bogus news.

Concordia University (US), Saveetha University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Spam and Phishing Detection
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.