Enhancing Accuracy in Early Pneumonia Diagnosis with a Novel Support Vector Machine and Convolutional Neural Network

This study aimed to enhance the early detection of pneumonia by using a new CNN instead of the traditional SVM technique. For this purpose, we used a dataset from Kaggle as our primary data source. We divided the study into two groups of 20 samples each: Group 1 used the CNN, while Group 2 used the SVM. Overall, the study involved 40 samples. To assess the performance of these two methods, we conducted statistical analysis using Python and clincalc.com, setting the statistical power (G-power) at 85%, the alpha level at 0.05, and the beta level at 0.2. Our analysis focused on comparing the accuracy of the CNN and the SVM. The results showed that the CNN achieved an accuracy of 96.1%, significantly higher than the 75% accuracy of the SVM. The statistical tests revealed a significant difference between the two methods, with a p-value less than 0.001.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120126
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Accuracy in Early Pneumonia Diagnosis with a Novel Support Vector Machine and Convolutional Neural Network

Rajkumar Palaniappan, V. Divya, R. Balamanigandan, P. Sadvika
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

Enhancing Accuracy in Early Pneumonia Diagnosis with a Novel Support Vector Machine and Convolutional Neural Network

Rajkumar Palaniappan, V. Divya, R. Balamanigandan, P. Sadvika
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to enhance the early detection of pneumonia by using a new CNN instead of the traditional SVM technique. For this purpose, we used a dataset from Kaggle as our primary data source. We divided the study into two groups of 20 samples each: Group 1 used the CNN, while Group 2 used the SVM. Overall, the study involved 40 samples. To assess the performance of these two methods, we conducted statistical analysis using Python and clincalc.com, setting the statistical power (G-power) at 85%, the alpha level at 0.05, and the beta level at 0.2. Our analysis focused on comparing the accuracy of the CNN and the SVM. The results showed that the CNN achieved an accuracy of 96.1%, significantly higher than the 75% accuracy of the SVM. The statistical tests revealed a significant difference between the two methods, with a p-value less than 0.001.

University College of Bahrain (BH), Saveetha University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.