Improved F-Measures Over Gaussian SVM for Handwritten Digit Recognition Using LSTM to Increase Accuracy

This study focuses on creating a model to recognize handwritten digits using LSTM-based networks and comparing its performance with a Gaussian SVM for optical character recognition. We used MNIST dataset, which contains <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{7 0, 0 0 0}$</tex> handwritten digit images. Out of these, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{6 0, 0 0 0}$</tex> images were used for training the models, and 10,000 were used for testing. To ensure our sample size was adequate, we used G-Power statistics software to conduct an 80 % power analysis, setting the alpha error rate at 0.05 to minimize type-I errors. The comparison showed that the Gaussian SVM model achieved an accuracy of 88 % in recognizing the digits. In contrast, the LSTM model performed much better, reaching an impressive 99% accuracy. The difference in performance was statistically significant, with a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{p}$</tex>-value of less than <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.0001(p&lt;0.05)$</tex>. These findings indicate that LSTM networks significantly outperform Gaussian SVMs in recognizing handwritten digits, making them a more effective choice for optical character recognition tasks. This research highlights the advantages of LSTM over traditional SVM approaches in handling complex recognition tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120173
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved F-Measures Over Gaussian SVM for Handwritten Digit Recognition Using LSTM to Increase Accuracy

Vineet Padmanabhan, Vamsi P Raghu, T. Rajesh Kumar, Shivam Sangam
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
article

Improved F-Measures Over Gaussian SVM for Handwritten Digit Recognition Using LSTM to Increase Accuracy

Vineet Padmanabhan, Vamsi P Raghu, T. Rajesh Kumar, Shivam Sangam
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on creating a model to recognize handwritten digits using LSTM-based networks and comparing its performance with a Gaussian SVM for optical character recognition. We used MNIST dataset, which contains <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{7 0, 0 0 0}$</tex> handwritten digit images. Out of these, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{6 0, 0 0 0}$</tex> images were used for training the models, and 10,000 were used for testing. To ensure our sample size was adequate, we used G-Power statistics software to conduct an 80 % power analysis, setting the alpha error rate at 0.05 to minimize type-I errors. The comparison showed that the Gaussian SVM model achieved an accuracy of 88 % in recognizing the digits. In contrast, the LSTM model performed much better, reaching an impressive 99% accuracy. The difference in performance was statistically significant, with a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{p}$</tex>-value of less than <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.0001(p&lt;0.05)$</tex>. These findings indicate that LSTM networks significantly outperform Gaussian SVMs in recognizing handwritten digits, making them a more effective choice for optical character recognition tasks. This research highlights the advantages of LSTM over traditional SVM approaches in handling complex recognition tasks.

BlueCrest University College (GH), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improved F-Measures Over Gaussian SVM for Handwritten Digit Recognition Using LSTM to Increase Accuracy — Vineet Padmanabhan, Vamsi P Raghu, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS