High Speed Intrusion Detection Using Lexicographic Method in Compared Over Artificial Neural Networks with Better Accuracy

The primary goal of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lexicographic Method for intrusion detection and compare its performance with Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). The study involved a sample size of 10 for each method, and we tested these methods multiple times to measure their accuracy. We used a pretest power analysis with an 80 % power level and a 95 % confidence interval to ensure our results were reliable. In the Lexicographic Method, the approach involves using multiple decision trees. Each tree generates its own classification, and the final decision is made based on which classification receives the most votes from these trees. Our findings indicate that there is a statistically insignificant difference between the Lexicographic Method and ANNs, with a p-value of 0.042, which is below the threshold of 0.05. However, the Lexicographic Method achieved an accuracy of 86.69 %, which is notably higher than the 84.65 % accuracy achieved by ANNs. This suggests that the Lexicographic Method is a more effective and straightforward approach for building fast and accurate machine learning models for intrusion detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120033
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Speed Intrusion Detection Using Lexicographic Method in Compared Over Artificial Neural Networks with Better Accuracy

Ranjit Singh, B Ramya, S. Saraswathi, B. Pavan
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

High Speed Intrusion Detection Using Lexicographic Method in Compared Over Artificial Neural Networks with Better Accuracy

Ranjit Singh, B Ramya, S. Saraswathi, B. Pavan
article en

Abstract

The primary goal of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lexicographic Method for intrusion detection and compare its performance with Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). The study involved a sample size of 10 for each method, and we tested these methods multiple times to measure their accuracy. We used a pretest power analysis with an 80 % power level and a 95 % confidence interval to ensure our results were reliable. In the Lexicographic Method, the approach involves using multiple decision trees. Each tree generates its own classification, and the final decision is made based on which classification receives the most votes from these trees. Our findings indicate that there is a statistically insignificant difference between the Lexicographic Method and ANNs, with a p-value of 0.042, which is below the threshold of 0.05. However, the Lexicographic Method achieved an accuracy of 86.69 %, which is notably higher than the 84.65 % accuracy achieved by ANNs. This suggests that the Lexicographic Method is a more effective and straightforward approach for building fast and accurate machine learning models for intrusion detection.

Sunway University (MY), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.