Comparison of Kneighborsclassifier with RF Algorithm to Improve Accuracy for Phishing Attack Detection in Website

The objective of this study is to improve the detection of phishing attacks, which aim to steal sensitive information from unsuspecting users, by comparing two machine learning algorithms: k-Nearest Neighbors (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{k - N N}$</tex>) and RF. In the study, we used a dataset of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{1 2 5}$</tex> images to evaluate both algorithms. Out of these images, 70% (or 130 frames) were allocated for training the models, while the remaining 30% were used for testing their performance. Each algorithm was tested through 20 separate iterations to ensure reliability. The accuracy of each algorithm was assessed using statistical analysis, with a G-Power value set at <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{8 0 \%}$</tex> for significance. The RF algorithm showed superior performance, achieving a high detection accuracy rate of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 0. 5 4 \%}$</tex> for phishing attacks. This result was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.04. In comparison, the k-NN algorithm did not perform as well. Overall, the study finds that the RF algorithm is more effective than k-NN in detecting phishing attacks, making it a better choice for enhancing cybersecurity measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120091
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Kneighborsclassifier with RF Algorithm to Improve Accuracy for Phishing Attack Detection in Website

R. Durga, S. Kalaiarasi, S R Sajith, P. Ganesh
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Comparison of Kneighborsclassifier with RF Algorithm to Improve Accuracy for Phishing Attack Detection in Website

R. Durga, S. Kalaiarasi, S R Sajith, P. Ganesh
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study is to improve the detection of phishing attacks, which aim to steal sensitive information from unsuspecting users, by comparing two machine learning algorithms: k-Nearest Neighbors (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{k - N N}$</tex>) and RF. In the study, we used a dataset of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{1 2 5}$</tex> images to evaluate both algorithms. Out of these images, 70% (or 130 frames) were allocated for training the models, while the remaining 30% were used for testing their performance. Each algorithm was tested through 20 separate iterations to ensure reliability. The accuracy of each algorithm was assessed using statistical analysis, with a G-Power value set at <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{8 0 \%}$</tex> for significance. The RF algorithm showed superior performance, achieving a high detection accuracy rate of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{9 0. 5 4 \%}$</tex> for phishing attacks. This result was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.04. In comparison, the k-NN algorithm did not perform as well. Overall, the study finds that the RF algorithm is more effective than k-NN in detecting phishing attacks, making it a better choice for enhancing cybersecurity measures.

Haringey Council (GB), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.