An Improved Naive Bayesian Human Activity Recognition System with Machine Learning via Support Vector Machine

Enhancing Human Activity Recognition with Support Vector Machine (SVM) over Naive Bayes (NB) is the primary goal of the research. SVM and NB are used in this study project. Using the G power software, the sample size is computed as 10 per group with a pre-test power of 80%, a threshold of 0.05%, and a confidence interval of 95%. SVM predicts a lower accuracy of 91.72% in Human Activity Recognition, while NB predicts a better accuracy of 93.32%. A statistically insignificant difference between the two groups is present, with a significance value of 0.09 (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p&gt;0.05$</tex>). Compared to NB algorithm, SVM algorithm predicts Human Activity Recognition more accurately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120200
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Improved Naive Bayesian Human Activity Recognition System with Machine Learning via Support Vector Machine

V. Mathivanan, E. K. Subramanian, S. Sinduja, CR. Kirankumar
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
article

An Improved Naive Bayesian Human Activity Recognition System with Machine Learning via Support Vector Machine

V. Mathivanan, E. K. Subramanian, S. Sinduja, CR. Kirankumar
article en

Abstract

Enhancing Human Activity Recognition with Support Vector Machine (SVM) over Naive Bayes (NB) is the primary goal of the research. SVM and NB are used in this study project. Using the G power software, the sample size is computed as 10 per group with a pre-test power of 80%, a threshold of 0.05%, and a confidence interval of 95%. SVM predicts a lower accuracy of 91.72% in Human Activity Recognition, while NB predicts a better accuracy of 93.32%. A statistically insignificant difference between the two groups is present, with a significance value of 0.09 (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p&gt;0.05$</tex>). Compared to NB algorithm, SVM algorithm predicts Human Activity Recognition more accurately.

German University of Technology (OM), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Improved Naive Bayesian Human Activity Recognition System with Machine Learning via Support Vector Machine — V. Mathivanan, E. K. Subramanian, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS