Multi-Criteria Analysis of Concept Drift Detection Algorithms: A Decision-Making Approach

Concept Drift is a challenging problem in data streaming, where the underlying data distribution changes over time. Numerous algorithms have been proposed to address this issue, each evaluated using various metrics such as accuracy, runtime, and false alarms. However, a comprehensive evaluation that simultaneously considers all these metrics is lacking. Motivated by this gap, our paper systematically benchmarks eleven leading concept drift detection algorithms using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach to identify the best-performing methods. We employ four datasets and seven performance measures: Average Delay Detection (ADD), Average True Detection (ATD), Average False Alarm (AFA), Average False Negative (AFN), Average Detection Runtime in milliseconds (ARMS), Average Memory Usage in bytes (MUB), and Average Accuracy. Our experimental evaluation and comparison are conducted against eleven existing detectors. The results show that our approach provides a balanced and comprehensive assessment, offering a significant advancement in the evaluation of concept drift detection methods. This paper provides a holistic strategy that integrates multiple performance metrics to enhance timely and efficient detection in various applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119834
Primary Topic
Data Stream Mining Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria Analysis of Concept Drift Detection Algorithms: A Decision-Making Approach

Savitri Bevinakoppa, Sarabjot Singh, Osama A. Mahdi
Data Stream Mining Techniques
article

Multi-Criteria Analysis of Concept Drift Detection Algorithms: A Decision-Making Approach

Savitri Bevinakoppa, Sarabjot Singh, Osama A. Mahdi
article en

Abstract

Concept Drift is a challenging problem in data streaming, where the underlying data distribution changes over time. Numerous algorithms have been proposed to address this issue, each evaluated using various metrics such as accuracy, runtime, and false alarms. However, a comprehensive evaluation that simultaneously considers all these metrics is lacking. Motivated by this gap, our paper systematically benchmarks eleven leading concept drift detection algorithms using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach to identify the best-performing methods. We employ four datasets and seven performance measures: Average Delay Detection (ADD), Average True Detection (ATD), Average False Alarm (AFA), Average False Negative (AFN), Average Detection Runtime in milliseconds (ARMS), Average Memory Usage in bytes (MUB), and Average Accuracy. Our experimental evaluation and comparison are conducted against eleven existing detectors. The results show that our approach provides a balanced and comprehensive assessment, offering a significant advancement in the evaluation of concept drift detection methods. This paper provides a holistic strategy that integrates multiple performance metrics to enhance timely and efficient detection in various applications.

Melbourne School of Theology (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Data Stream Mining Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.