Evaluating United States Air Force hearing conservation educational materials for compliance, readability, understandability, and actionability

Noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus are two of the most prevalent service-connected disabilities of United States military veterans. Educational materials meant for hearing conservation program-eligible Airmen were evaluated from active-duty, continental United States (CONUS) Air Force bases for compliance with US Air Force (USAF), Department of Defense (DoD), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Understandability and actionability were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), while readability was assessed with Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Educational materials were received from 44 of 61 (72%) active-duty, CONUS bases, with 27 bases sending one item and 17 bases sending multiple items, for a total of 67 educational materials, which were evaluated by three evaluators. Educational materials were categorized into one of four types: (A) supervisor's guide to hearing conservation (<i>n</i> = 21); (B) new worker hearing conservation training (<i>n</i> = 20); (C) two-page hearing conservation program training pamphlet (<i>n</i> = 14); and (D) other (<i>n</i> = 12). Overall mean compliance was 84% (CI: 63,100) (USAF), 83% (CI: 62,100) (DoD), and 88% (CI: 67,100) (OSHA), respectively. Overall mean understandability was 75% (CI: 63,87) and actionability was 89% (67,100). There was good agreement between the three evaluators for each of the criteria (87-90%). Overall mean readability was grade level 10.68 ± 1.68 on the FKGL scale. For educational materials, 65 of the 67 (97%) were above the recommended 6th-grade reading level, and 62 of the 67 (93%) educational materials were above the average American 8th-grade reading level. This study established compliance, understandability, actionability, and readability scores for educational materials that military service members receive upon entry into the hearing conservation program, gathered from active-duty, CONUS Air Force bases. Using the determined scores, recommendations, such as providing active feedback and condensing information, were given to improve future hearing conservation educational materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2529983
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating United States Air Force hearing conservation educational materials for compliance, readability, understandability, and actionability

James VanDerslice, Lisa H. Gren, Thomas Dominguez, Darrah K. Sleeth et al.
1 links
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Evaluating United States Air Force hearing conservation educational materials for compliance, readability, understandability, and actionability

James VanDerslice, Lisa H. Gren, Thomas Dominguez, Darrah K. Sleeth, C. Michael Garner, Lucas L. Pettit, Rodney G. Handy, Dirk P. Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus are two of the most prevalent service-connected disabilities of United States military veterans. Educational materials meant for hearing conservation program-eligible Airmen were evaluated from active-duty, continental United States (CONUS) Air Force bases for compliance with US Air Force (USAF), Department of Defense (DoD), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Understandability and actionability were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), while readability was assessed with Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Educational materials were received from 44 of 61 (72%) active-duty, CONUS bases, with 27 bases sending one item and 17 bases sending multiple items, for a total of 67 educational materials, which were evaluated by three evaluators. Educational materials were categorized into one of four types: (A) supervisor's guide to hearing conservation (<i>n</i> = 21); (B) new worker hearing conservation training (<i>n</i> = 20); (C) two-page hearing conservation program training pamphlet (<i>n</i> = 14); and (D) other (<i>n</i> = 12). Overall mean compliance was 84% (CI: 63,100) (USAF), 83% (CI: 62,100) (DoD), and 88% (CI: 67,100) (OSHA), respectively. Overall mean understandability was 75% (CI: 63,87) and actionability was 89% (67,100). There was good agreement between the three evaluators for each of the criteria (87-90%). Overall mean readability was grade level 10.68 ± 1.68 on the FKGL scale. For educational materials, 65 of the 67 (97%) were above the recommended 6th-grade reading level, and 62 of the 67 (93%) educational materials were above the average American 8th-grade reading level. This study established compliance, understandability, actionability, and readability scores for educational materials that military service members receive upon entry into the hearing conservation program, gathered from active-duty, CONUS Air Force bases. Using the determined scores, recommendations, such as providing active feedback and condensing information, were given to improve future hearing conservation educational materials.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental HygieneVol. 22(11)
East Tennessee State University (US), United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), University of Utah (US), General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN), Utah Department of Health (US), University of Utah Health Care (US)
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Air Force Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.